Advertisement
Research Article

Co-Evolution of Mitochondrial tRNA Import and Codon Usage Determines Translational Efficiency in the Green Alga Chlamydomonas

  • Thalia Salinas,

    Affiliations: Génétique des Microorganismes, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, UPR 2357, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    X
  • Francéline Duby,

    Affiliation: Génétique des Microorganismes, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium

    X
  • Véronique Larosa,

    Affiliation: Génétique des Microorganismes, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium

    X
  • Nadine Coosemans,

    Affiliation: Génétique des Microorganismes, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium

    X
  • Nathalie Bonnefoy,

    Affiliation: Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, UPR3404, FRC3115, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

    X
  • Patrick Motte,

    Affiliation: Functional Genomics and Plant Molecular Imaging, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium

    X
  • Laurence Maréchal-Drouard mail,

    laurence.drouard@ibmp-cnrs.unistra.fr (LM-D); c.remacle@ulg.ac.be (CR)

    Affiliation: Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes, UPR 2357, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    X
  • Claire Remacle mail

    laurence.drouard@ibmp-cnrs.unistra.fr (LM-D); c.remacle@ulg.ac.be (CR)

    Affiliation: Génétique des Microorganismes, Department of Life Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Li?ge, Li?ge, Belgium

    X
  • Published: September 20, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946

Abstract

Mitochondria from diverse phyla, including protozoa, fungi, higher plants, and humans, import tRNAs from the cytosol in order to ensure proper mitochondrial translation. Despite the broad occurrence of this process, our understanding of tRNA import mechanisms is fragmentary, and crucial questions about their regulation remain unanswered. In the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas, a precise correlation was found between the mitochondrial codon usage and the nature and amount of imported tRNAs. This led to the hypothesis that tRNA import might be a dynamic process able to adapt to the mitochondrial genome content. By manipulating the Chlamydomonas mitochondrial genome, we introduced point mutations in order to modify its codon usage. We find that the codon usage modification results in reduced levels of mitochondrial translation as well as in subsequent decreased levels and activities of respiratory complexes. These effects are linked to the consequential limitations of the pool of tRNAs in mitochondria. This indicates that tRNA mitochondrial import cannot be rapidly regulated in response to a novel genetic context and thus does not appear to be a dynamic process. It rather suggests that the steady-state levels of imported tRNAs in mitochondria result from a co-evolutive adaptation between the tRNA import mechanism and the requirements of the mitochondrial translation machinery.

Author Summary

Mitochondria are endosymbiotic organelles involved in diverse fundamental cellular processes. They contain their own genome that encodes a few but essential proteins (e.g. proteins of the respiratory chain complexes). Their synthesis requires functional mitochondrial translational machinery that necessitates a full set of transfer RNAs (tRNAs). As mitochondrial genomes of various organisms do not code for the complete set of tRNA genes, nucleus-encoded tRNAs have to be imported into mitochondria to compensate. Mitochondrial import of tRNAs is highly specific and tailored to the mitochondrial needs. Because transformation of the mitochondrial genome is possible in Chlamydomonas, we used this green alga as model to know if a fine regulation of the tRNA import process is possible so that the tRNA population can rapidly adapt to codon usage changes in mitochondria. Here we provide evidence that the regulation of tRNA mitochondrial import process is not dynamic but is rather the result of a co-evolutive process between the import and the mitochondrial codon bias in order to optimize the mitochondrial translation efficiency.

Introduction

Mitochondria are organelles found in almost all eukaryotic cells [1]. They contain a genetic system that encodes a number of protein-coding genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, which yields the bulk of the ATP made in cells. The synthesis of these mitochondria-encoded proteins is thus essential for life and requires a complete set of transfer RNAs (tRNAs). In many organisms, however, the number of mitochondrial tRNA genes is not sufficient to ensure mitochondrial translation and nucleus-encoded tRNAs have to be imported from the cytosol to mitochondria. The mitochondrial import of cytosolic tRNAs is a widespread phenomenon and has been experimentally documented in diverse organisms including protozoa, fungi, higher plants and mammals [2]. Interestingly, in some organisms where mitochondrial genomes are apparently equipped with a minimal set of tRNA genes sufficient for mitochondrial translation [3], tRNA import can occur under certain circumstances, as documented in yeast and in human [4], [5]. The number of imported tRNAs into mitochondria ranges from one to the whole set in a species-specific manner [6][8].

Our knowledge on the tRNA mitochondrial import regulation is still limited [2], [8][10]. The nucleus-encoded tRNAs imported into mitochondria are used in the cytosolic translation machinery and only a small percentage of cytosolic tRNAs is present in mitochondria. Furthermore, variations between the extents of mitochondrial localization of individual nucleus-encoded tRNAs have been observed. Indeed, in Leishmania tarentolae, tRNAs are classified into three groups (mainly cytosolic, mainly mitochondrial and shared between the two compartments) according to their relative abundance in the cytosol or mitochondria [11]. In Trypanosoma brucei, the quantification of the absolute abundance of each tRNA in the cell and in mitochondria revealed that the extent of their mitochondrial localization fluctuates between 1 and 7.5% [12], [13]. In plants, some evidence supports the idea that a differential distribution of nuclear encoded tRNAs between the cytosol and mitochondria exists. Studies on tobacco tRNAGly issoacceptors showed that the mitochondria-imported tRNAGly(UCC) represents 2.5% of total tRNAGly(UCC) whereas the mitochondria-imported tRNAGly(CCC) represents 6.5% of total tRNAGly(CCC) [14]. In wheat, the nucleus-encoded tRNALeu(UAA) was shown to be in higher amount in mitochondria than in the cytosol [15] and in potato, the nucleus-encoded tRNAsVal and tRNAsThr are 2–3 times less abundant that the nucleus-encoded tRNAsLeu [16]. What triggers the differential distribution of nucleus-encoded tRNAs between the cytosol and mitochondria in any of these organisms remain an open question.

In addition it is known that the cellular concentration of the various tRNA species needed for ribosome-dependent protein synthesis correlates well with the respective amounts of amino acids to be incorporated in the newly synthesized proteins [17], [18], in other words correlates with codon usage. In this work we question how such correlation occurs between the mitochondrial import of nucleus-encoded tRNAs and mitochondrial codon usage. To answer this question, the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was used as a model organism. Several reasons dictated this choice. First, its mitochondrial genome only encodes 3 tRNA genes [19] so that its mitochondrial translation machinery primarily depends on tRNA mitochondrial import. Indeed, out of the 49 cytosolic tRNA issoacceptors, 34 are found within mitochondria. Second, as observed in higher plants, this import is highly specific since only necessary cytosolic tRNAs are imported. In addition, the extent of mitochondrial localization for each tRNA species is highly variable. For 31 tRNAs, it ranges from 0.2% to 26% and for three tRNAs it is equal or above 80%. Interestingly, the observed steady-state levels of imported tRNAs correlate with the mitochondrial codon usage, thus suggesting that the levels of imported tRNAs would be defined by the information residing in the mitochondrial DNA in order to allow optimal mitochondrial translation [20]. Third, the mitochondrial genome of Chlamydomonas can be manipulated [21] offering the possibility to modify its codon usage.

Given these prerequisites, we decided to replace in Chlamydomonas mitochondrial genes an often-used codon by a seldom-used codon encoding the same amino acid and to check the repercussions on tRNA mitochondrial import. For this, the tRNAGly isoacceptors were used as model and the GGC and GGT Glycine codons were replaced by GGG codons in mitochondrial genes. Our results show that massive changes are not accepted by mitochondria and only two transformants in the homoplasmic state were obtained with 10 and 11 additional GGG codons, respectively. The analysis on the import status of the tRNAGly isoacceptors showed no adaptation to the new GGG codon content in the mitochondrial genome. We found that these few modifications result in decreased levels and activities of respiratory complexes which could be explained by reduced levels of mitochondrial translation. This demonstrates that the regulation of mitochondrial tRNA import is not dynamic but rather fixed during evolution in order to meet the requirement of the mitochondrial translation machinery.

Results

Modification of the mitochondrial glycine codon usage

Three cytosolic tRNAGly isoacceptors have been identified in Chlamydomonas: tRNAGly(CCC), tRNAGly(GCC) and tRNAGly(UCC). The first one, tRNAGly(CCC) is poorly imported into mitochondria and represents 0.15% of total cytosolic tRNAGly(CCC). By contrast, tRNAGly(GCC) and tRNAGly(UCC) are efficiently imported into mitochondria (3.6% and 4.2% of total cytosolic tRNAGly(GCC) and tRNAGly(UCC) respectively) [20]. The tRNAGly(CCC) decodes the GGG codon, a codon only present three times in the whole mitochondrial genome and representing 0.1% of total codons. The tRNAGly(GCC) enables the decoding of both GGC and GGT codons that together represent 7.5% of all the codons in mitochondria [19]. Both tRNAGly(GCC) and tRNAGly(CCC) illustrate the strong correlation observed in Chlamydomonas between the efficiency of tRNA import into mitochondria and the codon usage in the mitochondrial genome. So, we decided to replace the GGC and GGT codons by GGG codons in mitochondrial genes in order to increase the needs of tRNAGly(CCC) in mitochondria.

No transformants can be recovered when a modified version of the cob gene containing only GGG codons is used for transformation of the dum11 mutant

The pCucob construct that bears the left mitochondrial terminal repeat, a version of the cob gene where all the 34 GGT/GGC codons were converted into GGG codons (Figure S1) and 187 bp of the nd4 gene was used to transform Chlamydomonas cells of the dum11 mutant deleted for part of the cob gene and the left terminal repeat (Figure 1A). After a two months selection in heterotrophic conditions (dark+acetate), seven transformants were recovered. PCR analysis using primers specific for the left telomere and the cob gene (i.e. cobF/cobR and telF/cobR pair primers; Figure 1A) revealed that all of them still bore the deletion of the extremity of the genome, as exemplified for two of them (Figure 1B). Such “transformants” have already been observed previously and likely correspond to mutant cells that survived to the two months period in the dark [21]. In contrast and as expected, when the pND4-LP construct containing a non-mutated version of the cob gene was used to transform dum11 (Figure 1A), 92 true transformants bearing the left telomere and the cob gene could be rescued as shown in [22] (Figure 1B).

thumbnail

Figure 1. Molecular characterization of the transformants.

(A) Schematic map of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondrial genome. Boxes represent protein-coding genes: (cob) apocytochrome b of complex III; (nd1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) subunits of complex I; (cox1) subunit 1 of complex IV; (rtl) reverse transcriptase-like protein. W, Q, and M represent tRNAs for Trp, Glu, and Met, respectively. The bidirectional origin of transcription between nd5 and cox1 genes is represented by a dashed vertical line and two horizontal arrows. Terminal inverted repeats are shown by short arrows and SacI digestion site at position 5.5 kb (GenBank u03843 numbering) is indicated. Region where modifications on the nd4 gene were found on T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants is indicated in grey. Position and name of primers are indicated above the map. Primers with a star are specific for the modified gene version (for primer sequence see Table S1). Positions of the dum11 and dum22 deletions are shown. Mitochondrial DNA fragments contained in pND4-LP, pCucob and pCumut are schematized. Grey boxes represent the modified genes where GGC/GGT codons were changed in GGG codons. (B) Detection of the cob gene in transformants obtained after biolistic transformation with pND4-LP (T-ND4-LP) and pCucob (T-cucob) constructs. PCR analyses were performed with cobF/cobR (1) and telF/cobR (2) pair primers. (C) Detection of the mutated and the wild-type nd4 genes on T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants. PCR analyses were performed with 4F2*/4R2 and 4F2/4R2 pair primers for the modified nd4 gene (nd4*) and for wild-type nd4 gene (nd4) respectively. (D–E) Reconstitution of complete mitochondrial genome in T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants. Southern blot analyses were performed (D) on total DNA with the nd6 PCR probe and (E) on SacI digested DNA with nd4 and nd6 PCR probes. (F) Transcript levels of nd4 and nd6 genes in T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants. Northern blot analyses were performed on total RNA with nd4 and nd6 PCR probes. Loadings of rRNAs are shown.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g001

Heteroplasmic transformants with up to 10 GGG codons in nd4 can be selected by transformation of the dum11 mutant

The rescue of the cob gene is essential for the recovery of respiration and the ability to grow in the dark. Results presented above suggest that the presence of GGG codons in the cob gene fails to restore growth in the dark. A plausible explanation is that there is not enough of imported tRNAGly(CCC) to allow for an efficient decoding of the novel mitochondrial GGG codons to synthesize COB or in other words that Chlamydomonas mitochondrial tRNA import machinery cannot adapt rapidly to a massive change in mitochondrial codon usage. In order to determine whether some adaptation is possible, attempts were made to modify the codon usage in nd4 and nd5 genes. These two genes encode subunits of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) and mutants deprived for one or the other subunit are still able to grow in the dark, albeit slower than the wild-type strain [23][25]. In addition, viable mitochondrial transformants mutated in nd4 could be recovered after transformation using a transforming DNA bearing a mutation in that gene [21], [22]. A cloned version of the mitochondrial nd4 and nd5 genes was thus designed where all the 26 and 55 GGC/GGT codons were replaced by GGG in nd4 and nd5 respectively (Figures S2 and S3). The pCumut construct with a mitochondrial DNA fragment comprising the wild-type cob gene and the codon modified version of the nd4 and nd5 genes was introduced in Chlamydomonas cells by biolistic transformation of dum11 (Figure 1A). After two months in the dark, 559 transformants were recovered. Screening of the transformants for codon modification was based on PCR analysis with four pair primers: two for the nd4 gene (4F2*/4R2 and 4F1/4R3*) and two for the nd5 gene (5F1/5R2* and 5F2*/5R1). Each pair of primers is composed of an oligonucleotide specific for mutated positions on the modified gene (indicated with stars) and of an oligonucleotide specific for a non-modified region in the gene (Figure 1A and Figures S2 and S3). After analysis of the 559 transformants by these four PCRs, two transformants (n° 29 and 61) with modifications in the nd4 gene were found and none for modifications in nd5 gene. In addition, both transformants were found heteroplasmic as shown for clone 29 (Figure 1C). The exact number of codon modifications, determined by sequencing, is ten in clone 29 and six in clone 61 and all GGG codons were located in the 3′ end of nd4, (i.e. the closest region with regards to the dum11 mitochondrial DNA deletion) (Figure 1A). Consequently, the percentage of GGG codons in mitochondria of the two mutants increased from 0.1% in wild type to 0.29% in clone 61 and 0.42% in clone 29. Clone 29 was kept for further analyses and called T11-10. This mutant was also repeatedly subcloned and one year after its isolation, a mutant homoplasmic for the modification of the 10 codons was isolated. This homoplasmic mutant was called T11-10/2 (Figure 1C).

A homoplasmic transformant with 11 GGG codons in nd4 can be selected after transformation of the dum22 mutant deleted for cob and nd4

As the number of codons modified was low using the dum11 strain, another recipient strain was then used for transformation: the dum22 mutant. This mutant strain is deleted for the left terminal repeat, cob and the 3′ end of nd4 gene [21], [22] (Figure 1A). The deletion in nd4 could favor the integration of homoplasmic codon modification in that gene. The same plasmid as described above (pCumut) was used for transformation. One single transformant could be rescued and sequencing showed that it displayed one more modified codon at the 3′ end of nd4 gene as compared to the T11-10 transformant (Figure S2). This transformant with 11 modified codons was found to be in the homoplasmic state (Figure 1C) and called T22-11. The percentage of GGG mitochondrial codons increases from 0.1% in wild type strain to 0.45% in T22-11.

To check the integrity of the mitochondrial genome in the three transformants T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11, further molecular analyses were performed. Total undigested DNA of each of the three transformants was probed with a mitochondrial nd6 PCR amplified fragment. All of them displayed the same mitochondrial DNA as the control wild-type strain while the DNA migration profile of the dum22 recipient strain displayed a different profile due to the presence of deleted monomers and dimers resulting from head to head fusion of deleted monomers, as already noted previously [26] (Figure 1D). In addition, Southern blot experiments on total DNA digested with SacI were performed using two probes, the one cited above that covered nd6 and the other that covered nd4. The three transformants exhibited the same profile as the wild-type strain while the dum22 strain exhibited a shorter fragment with the nd4 probe, reflecting the terminal deletion of the genome in that strain (Figure 1E). All these results thus show that the three transformants have recovered a wild-type mitochondrial genome, except for the modification of the codon usage in nd4. In addition, Northern blot analysis using the same two probes revealed that nd4 and nd6 were expressed at the same level in the three transformants T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 as in wild type (Figure 1F).

Respiration and growth characteristics of the transformants

To determine whether the mitochondrial codon usage modification either in the heteroplasmic T11-10 or the homoplasmic T11-10/2, T22-11 state would have an impact on physiological activities linked to mitochondria, dark whole cell respiration and doubling times were measured (Table 1). Two wild-type transformants (i.e. transformants having recovered the wild-type mitochondrial sequence after transformation with the pND4-LP construct), one coming from the dum11 recipient strain T11-WT and one coming from the dum22 strain T22-WT [22] were added as control strains. No change in the dark respiration rate and no change of the doubling time in heterotrophic condition were observed in the heteroplasmic T11-10 mutant as compared to T11-WT. By contrast, the dark respiration rates of the two transformants homoplasmic for modified codon usage, T11-10/2 and T22-11, are significantly lower than those of their corresponding wild-type transformants (P<0.05). In addition, doubling time in heterotrophic condition is significantly higher in both homoplasmic T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants as compared to T11-WT and T22-WT but not in the light. In conclusion, codon usage modification in nd4, when present in the homoplasmic state, impairs respiration and growth of the transformants in the dark.

thumbnail

Table 1. Total respiration and doubling time in T11-10, T11-10/2, and T22-11 transformants.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.t001

Respiratory complexes in transformants with modified codon usage in nd4

To try to identify the cause of the decreased respiration rates, activities of the respiratory complexes were measured on membrane extracts of the three transformants T11-10, T11-10/2, T22-11. The two wild-type transformants T11-WT and T22-WT were added as control strains (Figure 2). Activity of complex I was measured both at the level of the NADH dehydrogenase activity of the peripheral arm (NADH:ferricyanide activity) and at the level of the whole complex I (oxidation of NADH and subsequent transfer of electrons to the membrane domain: NADH:duroquinone activity). Although there is a decrease of complex I and complex IV activities for the heteroplasmic transformant T11-10 compared to T11-WT, the difference is not significant (P>0.05). In contrast, when the codon modification in nd4 is in the homoplasmic state, a significant 70% decrease (P<0.05) of the NADH:duroquinone activity and a significant 45% decrease (P<0.05) of the NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I was noticed in the T11-10/2 and T22-11 transformants. Complex IV is also significantly reduced by about 50% in T11-10/2 and T22-11. In contrast, complex II+III activity was not found modified either in T11-10 or in T22-11 but was found significantly increased in T11-10/2. This increase in complex II+III activity is usually observed in Chlamydomonas mutants deprived of complex I activity and could represent a kind of compensatory effect [22], [23].

thumbnail

Figure 2. Respiratory enzyme activities of T11-10, T11-10/2, and T22-11 transformants.

Respiratory activities were measured on membrane fractions of T11-10, T11-10/2 and T22-11 mutants. NADH:Duroquinone corresponds to the rotenone-sensitive NADH:duroquinone oxidoreductase activity (nmol of NADH oxidized min−1 mg of proteins−1); NADH:Ferricyanide corresponds to the NADH:Fe(CN)63− oxidoreductase activity (nmol of K3Fe(CN)63− reduced min−1 mg of proteins−1); CII+III corresponds to the succinate:cytochrome c oxidoreductase activity (nmol cytochrome c reduced min−1 mg of proteins−1); CIV corresponds to the cytochrome c oxidase activity (nmol of cytochrome c oxidized min−1 mg of proteins−1). Asterisks indicate statistically significantly differences using Student t test with a significance threshold of 0.05. Results are means of 3 to 6 independent experiments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g002

The decreased activities of respiratory complex I and IV can thus explain why reduced respiration rates are found in the homoplasmic transformants. In addition, we can conclude that we are able to distinguish the impact of the codon modification as far as the codon modification is found in the homoplasmic state (T11-10/2 and T22-11), whatever the strain used for mitochondrial transformation (dum11 or dum22). In contrast, no differences could be detected in the heteroplasmic T11-10 transformant. This latter strain contains a mixture of wild-type and mutant copies, it is therefore likely that the impact of the codon modification is hidden by the wild type copies of the mitochondrial genome. As the two homoplasmic transformants show very similar profile, we kept only the T22-11 transformant for further analyses because it contains the highest number of modified GGG codons (11).

To analyze the assembly of the respiratory complexes, mitochondria isolated from T22-WT or T22-11 cell-wall less strains were analyzed on Blue Native PAGE (BN-PAGE). For that purpose, equal amounts of mitochondrial proteins of both strains were solubilized with n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside. Complex I was detected by two stainings: Coomassie Blue staining (Figure 3A) which detects the respiratory complexes and NADH/NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium) staining (Figure 3B) which reveals the NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I. Complex I was detected at 950 kDa in both T22-WT and T22-11, demonstrating that the codon modification in nd4 does not prevent the assembly of the whole complex (Figure 3A and 3B). However, both Coomassie Blue and NADH/NBT stainings of complex I are decreased in T22-11. Complex IV was detected at 250 kDa (Figure 3A). Again, both the activity (Figure 3C) and the amount (Figure 3A) are similarly reduced. Dimeric complex V was detected at 1700 kDa (Figure 3A). Contrary to the situation observed for the other complexes, no clear modification of amount (Figure 3A) or activity (Figure 3D) could be seen.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Analysis of mitochondrial complexes of T22-11 transformant.

Solubilized mitochondria (30 µg) were loaded on a BN-PAGE and stained (A) with Coomassie Blue, (B) for the NADH dehydrogenase activity of complex I, (C) for the complex IV activity and (D) for the ATP synthase activity. (E) Mitochondrial proteins of T22-WT and T22-11 (10 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted and probed with antisera against the 49 kDa subunit of Chlamydomonas complex I, against the β subunit of the Chlamydomonas mitochondrial ATP synthase, against the Cox3 subunit of S. cerevisiae and against the VdacI Chlamydomonas protein. (F) Densitometry analysis of the Western blots. Results are means of 2 independent experiments.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g003

We then analyzed the steady-state levels of various mitochondrial proteins by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (Figure 3E). The 49 kDa subunit of complex I and the Cox3 subunit of complex IV showed a strong decrease of their amount in T22-11 as compared to T22-WT. In contrast, the steady-state level of the β subunit of complex V was not significantly affected. As a control, a porin from the outer mitochondrial membrane (VdacI) did not present any modification. Densitometry analysis of the Western blots confirmed these observations (Figure 3F).

Altogether, these results suggest that while neither components of the outer membrane, such as VdacI, nor complex V of the respiratory chain are affected by modification of mitochondrial codon usage, there is a clear decrease in both the amount and the activity of respiratory complexes I and IV in the homoplasmic mutant.

Membrane potential is not affected in T22-11 mitochondria

Complex I links the electron transfer from NADH to ubiquinone to the pumping of four protons from the matrix into the intermembrane space. Similarly, complex IV links the electron transfer from cytochrome c to molecular oxygen to the pumping of four protons across the inner membrane. To see whether membrane potential of mitochondrial membranes could be affected by the reduced activity and assembly of complex I and IV in T22-11 compared to T22-WT, mitochondria from living cells of these transformants were labeled separately with a MitoTracker dye and observed under confocal laser microscopy. The MitoTracker used (MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos) is sequestered in the mitochondria when entering an actively respiring cell. It is thus dependent on membrane potential. Figure 4 illustrates the analysis of T22-11, T22-WT and dum22, the recipient strain of the transformation. Mitochondria of this latter mutant are completely deprived of both complex I and complex III assembly and activity. As expected, labeling of the dum22 mitochondria is very weak as compared to the T22-WT strain, meaning that membrane potential is affected in this recipient strain. In contrast, there was no obvious difference of mitochondria labeling between T22-WT and T22-11 suggesting that in vivo, the impact of the reduction of the complex I and complex IV activities on membrane potential is minor.

thumbnail

Figure 4. Confocal microscopy of mitochondria from T22-WT, T22-11, and dum22 stained with MitoTracker dyes.

Visualization in T22-WT, T22-11 and dum22 strains (A) of mitochondria by MitoTracker dye, (B) of chloroplast by chlorophyll autofluorescence and (C) of the overlapping images in Chlamydomonas cells. The white line corresponds to 5 µm.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g004

Steady-state levels of mitochondrial tRNAs are marginally modified in the T22-11 transformant

Respiratory complexes for which levels or activities were decreased all contain mitochondria-encoded subunits: complex I contains five mitochondria-encoded subunits (ND1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) and complex IV contains one subunit (COX1). In contrast, complex V does not contain any mitochondria-encoded subunits. This suggests that mitochondrial translation could be affected in the transformant and led us to analyze the steady-state levels of imported and non-imported tRNAs in T22-11 mitochondria. For that purpose, Northern blot experiments on mitochondrial tRNAs extracted from the T22-WT and the T22-11 transformants were performed. A probe directed against the 3La mitochondrial rRNA was used to normalize the signals obtained with the probes specific for seven different tRNAs (Figure 5A and Table S2). Since the codon modifications in T22-11 increase the number of GGG codons, we first focused on the steady-state levels of the tRNAGly(CCC). According to our hypothesis, if a fine-tuning of tRNA import exists to rapidly adapt the tRNA population to the needs of Chlamydomonas mitochondria, then an increased amount of mitochondrial tRNAGly(CCC) is expected in T22-11 as compared to T22-WT as a result of an increased tRNA import efficiency. Rather, a 30% decrease of its steady-state level was observed (Figure 5B). For the two other tRNAGly isoacceptors namely tRNAGly(GCC) that recognizes GGC/GGT codons and tRNAGly(UCC) that recognizes the GGA codon, a 17% and a 21% increase of their steady-state levels were respectively observed in mitochondria . The analysis of the steady-state levels of two mitochondrial tRNAs, tRNAMet and tRNAGln, showed no significant difference (P>0.05) indicating that mitochondrial gene expression is not affected in T22-11. Finally, the levels of two other cytosolic tRNAs were analyzed, i.e. of tRNAVal(AAC) that is imported into mitochondria and of tRNALeu(AAG) that is mostly not imported [20]. The steady-state level of tRNAVal(AAC) is not affected while a diminution of 17% of the steady-state level of tRNALeu(AAG) was observed. Since in wild-type strain, the mitochondrial level of tRNALeu(AAG) is comparable to the background of contamination [20], this decrease (17%) may just reflect a lower cytosolic contamination of purified mitochondria from T22-11 as compared to T22-WT. This may also explain why we observed a similar decreased level for tRNAGly(CCC) which, as tRNALeu(AAG), is present at a very low level in mitochondria.

thumbnail

Figure 5. Analysis of the import status of mitochondrial tRNAs in T22-11 transformant.

(A) Northern blot analysis of mitochondrial tRNAs extracted from the T22-WT strain and T22-11 transformant. Hybridizations were performed with radiolabeled oligonucleotides specific for cytosolic tRNAGly(GCC) (G1), tRNAGly(UCC) (G2), tRNAGly(CCC) (G3), tRNAVal(AAC) (V) and tRNALeu(AAG) (L); for mitochondrial tRNAMet (M mt), tRNAGln (Q mt) and for the mitochondrial L3a rRNA (L3a mt). (B) Signals were quantified and normalized with the L3a mt signal. Results are the means of 3 to 5 independent experiments and correspond to the percentage of variation of tRNA steady-state levels in the T22-11 transformant as compared to the T22-WT strain. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences using Student t test with a significance threshold of 0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g005

In conclusion, although a slight increase of the steady-state levels of the two other tRNAGly isoacceptors was observed, which could reflect some flexibility of tRNA mitochondrial import, the increase of GGG codons from 3 (found in the rtl gene) in the T22-WT transformant to 14 in the T22-11 transformant does not enhance the mitochondrial import of nucleus-encoded tRNAGly(CCC). Taking as a whole, this analysis strongly suggests that tRNA mitochondrial import cannot rapidly adapt to fast changes induced in the mitochondrial genome.

In organello protein synthesis is less efficient in T22-11 mitochondria

The nd4 gene that codes for one subunit of respiratory complex I is the only gene modified in the T22-11 mutant. Surprisingly, this transformant shows a diminution of the level and the activity not only of complex I but also of complex IV, two complexes that contain mitochondria-encoded subunits. As we have demonstrated above that the steady-state level of the tRNAGly(CCC) cannot adapt to the modification of codon usage in mitochondria and as codon bias can affect translation [27], we decided to compare the in organello protein synthesis efficiency of mitochondria isolated from the T22-11 and T22-WT transformants. After incubation in the presence of 35S-Methionine under conditions optimized for higher plant in organello protein synthesis, proteins were extracted from mitochondria and analyzed by PAGE. Coomassie Blue staining (Figure 6A) was used as a loading control. The use of equal amount of purified mitochondria was also attested by Western blot analysis using an antibody raised against the mitochondrial VdacI (Figure 6B). The radiolabeled synthesized proteins were visualized by autoradiography of the Coomassie Blue stained gel (Figure 6C). The expected migration of the eight proteins encoded by the Chlamydomonas mitochondrial DNA is indicated according to their theoretical molecular weights. For both transformants, nine major bands (annotated b1 to b9) are visible upon autoradiography (Figure 6C). To our knowledge, there is no report yet of in organello protein synthesis data in Chlamydomonas mitochondria and more studies will be necessary for a detailed investigation of the pattern. However, the fact that only a small number of bands were detected makes us confident that we are truly observing the translation of mitochondria-encoded proteins. In addition, even if we observed some discrepancies between the theoretical migration profile of the eight mitochondria-encoded proteins and the experimental protein pattern resulting from in organello synthesis, we can conclude that the amount of the majority of the synthesized proteins was decreased in T22-11 and this was confirmed by quantification of the signals (Figure 6D). This is especially true for b8 and b9, which could correspond to isoforms of ND6, the smallest protein encoded by the mitochondrial genome, whose low molecular weight allows us to discriminate it from the other mitochondria-encoded proteins. There were only two exceptions, b1 and b5, which showed a slight upregulation. However, the apparent molecular weight of the protein corresponding to b1 is higher than that expected for a mitochondria-encoded protein, thus suggesting that this protein is likely a plastidial or cytosolic contaminant. Altogether, these results show that the modification of codon usage in nd4 has an impact on the translation efficiency of the whole mitochondrial genome, which could explain why the amount of the respiratory complexes containing mitochondria-encoded subunits (complex I and IV) is decreased.

thumbnail

Figure 6. Mitochondrial in organello protein synthesis of T22-11 transformant.

(A) Mitochondrial proteins of T22-WT and T22-11 (25 µg) were loaded on SDS-PAGE after mitochondrial in organello protein synthesis and stained with Coomassie Blue. (B) Mitochondrial protein samples (10 µg) coming from the same experiment as described in (A) were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted and probed with antisera against the VdacI Chlamydomonas protein. (C) Mitochondrial translated proteins from experiment (A) were visualized by autoradiography. Expected migration of the eight mitochondrial proteins are indicated. Major bands obtained in the in organello protein synthesis are indicated from b1 to b9. (D) Major bands (b1 to b9) were quantified. The histogram corresponds to the percentage of variation in the T22-11 transformant as compared to the T22-WT strain. The experiment was repeated two times and showed the same decrease of the annotated bands.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.g006

Discussion

We have tested here the idea of an adaptive tRNA import process in mitochondria. Different mitochondrial transformations were performed in order to replace often-used codons (i.e. GGC/GGT) by a seldom-used codon (i.e. GGG codon). Only three transformants were obtained with a maximum of 11 modifications in the nd4 gene. Like previously observed [22], the efficiency of transformation was very low using the dum22 mutant, since only one transformant (T22-11) was recovered. However, this transformant was very useful because it was the only one to be homoplasmic directly after the two-month selection in the dark and it contained the highest number of GGG codons. It thus appears that the mitochondrial genome of the transformant integrated the minimal sequence to recover a non-deleted genome, which included GGG codons. In contrast, when it is possible to avoid the integration of the modified codons, for example when the dum11 mutant was used as recipient strain, a much higher number of transformants (559) were recovered. However, amongst them, a very few number (2 out 559) had GGG codons and in that case, they were in the heteroplasmic state. Nevertheless, homoplasmic state could be reached after one year of repeated rounds of subcloning. This strongly suggests that the integration of modified codons in the mitochondrial DNA is unfavorable for the Chlamydomonas cells. Indeed, homoplasmic transformants presented a reduced growth rate and respiration and longer doubling time in heterotrophic conditions whereas their growth rates were not affected in mixotrophic conditions (light + acetate) probably because in that case, growth relies on photosynthesis. In vitro, they exhibited reduced respiratory enzymes activities and reduced amounts of complexes I and IV. In vivo, mitochondrial membrane potential did not seem modified. This suggests that proton pumping of complex I and complex IV are not severely affected or that the increase in complex II+III activity could compensate for the less efficient proton pumping at complex I and IV. Similar results were already observed for complex I mutants deprived of complex I activity and assembly [22]. The impossibility to obtain transformants with more codon modifications indicates that the number of modifications cannot exceed a particular threshold without being lethal in our conditions of selection. Thus, the tRNA mitochondrial import is not dynamically regulated but rather has been fixed during evolution in order to meet the requirement of the mitochondrial translation machinery. The analysis of the T22-11 transformant harboring 11 GGC/GGT codons modified into GGG codons in nd4 showed that the tRNAGly(CCC) import was not adapted to the new GGG codon content in the mitochondrial genome. We cannot exclude the possibility that the inability to increase the import of tRNAGly(CCC) into mitochondria comes from the unavailability of this tRNA in the cytosol. Indeed, analyzing mitochondrial and cytosolic codon frequencies, we previously showed that tRNAGly(CCC) is more solicited in the cytosol than in mitochondria. As tRNAGly(CCC) is encoded by a single gene [28] and as cytosolic tRNA levels are well tuned to cytosolic translational demand, the absence of adaptation for the new need of tRNAGly(CCC) in mitochondria of transformants may be due to insufficient amount of free tRNAGly(CCC) that are engaged in the cytosolic translational machinery. Further studies aiming at adding several tRNAGly(CCC) gene copies in the nuclear genome of the T22-11 transformant, thus increasing the steady-state level of this tRNA in the cytosol, must tell us whether the overexpressed tRNA can compensate for the new need of extra tRNAGly(CCC) in mitochondria of this mutant strain or whether its mitochondrial import is still restricted by the import machinery.

Yet, a slight increase of the import of the two other tRNAGly isoacceptors was observed. An attractive hypothesis to explain this would be that this increase would compensate the shortage of tRNAGly(CCC). Indeed, depending on the repertoire of isoacceptor tRNAs and on the type of modified nucleotides found at the first position of the anticodon, four main decoding strategies were identified by Grosjean et al. [29]. Depending on the strategy used, the GGG codon can also be read by a tRNAGly(UCC), meaning that in theory two isoacceptor tRNAs can read the same codon. However, in none of the strategy, the tRNAGly(GCC) would be able to read GGG codons. In Chlamydomonas mitochondria, the most abundant tRNAGly has a GCC anticodon, and the tRNAGly(UCC) is found in much lower amount [20]. Indeed, there are 17 tRNAGly(GCC) gene copies but only one gene for tRNAGly(UCC) and one for tRNAGly(CCC) in the nuclear genome [28]. Considering that the most abundant tRNAGly, the tRNAGly(GCC), cannot compete for decoding the GGG codons and that the one that can potentially compete, the tRNAGly(UCC), is present in low amount, it is likely that the other tRNAGly present in mitochondria cannot compensate the even modest increase in GGG codon content in the mutant strains. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in chloroplasts that the tRNAGly(UCC) is capable of reading the four Glycine codons according to the superwobbling rule [30]. However supperwobble is only possible if U34 is not modified and nucleus-encoded imported tRNAGly(UCC) was shown to be post-transcriptionally modified at this position in plants [31], [32]. Thus, although we cannot completely exclude that the imported mitochondrial tRNAGly(UCC) can be used as an alternative to compensate for the inability to rapidly increase the import level of the tRNAGly(CCC) in order to read the additional GGG codons, it is very unlikely.

We have thus in our hand a mutant affected for mitochondrial codon usage in nd4. Interestingly, the consequences of these modifications are not restricted to the multisubunit enzyme (complex I) which comprises ND4 but also concern other respiratory complexes such as complex IV which contains a mitochondria-encoded subunit (COX1). In contrast, complex V that does not bear any mitochondria-encoded subunit in Chlamydomonas is not (or much less) affected as well as VdacI, a porin of the outer mitochondrial membrane. The general reduction of respiratory enzymes containing mitochondria-encoded subunits could be explained by the decrease of mitochondrial translation that we detected by in organello protein synthesis. The question of the reason why the modified codon usage in nd4 affects the whole mitochondrial translation process and not only that of ND4 is open. The recent work in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae could shed light on that point [27]. These authors showed that translational efficiency is optimized by a mechanism that relies on proportional use of codons according to their cognate tRNA concentrations, suggesting that the codon-tRNA balance is the major factor determining translation efficiency [27]. Importantly, they propose that preferentially used codons are not translated faster than unpreferred ones but that this phenomenon is a result of codon usage in proportion to cognate tRNA concentrations, the optimal strategy in enhancing translational efficiency under tRNA shortage. According to their model, the introduction of eleven GGG codons in the nd4 gene would break the established codon-tRNA balance causing the decrease of translational efficiency in mitochondria, and indeed, this is what was observed for the T22-11 transformant. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the impact of codon bias on translation by itself is demonstrated in mitochondria. This explains why the fitness of the cells is decreased in conditions where growth relies on respiration (heterotrophic conditions).

In conclusion, our work shows that mitochondrial tRNA import cannot adapt rapidly in Chlamydomonas and that codon bias has a direct effect on translation efficiency. These data demonstrate that the information residing in the mitochondrial DNA does not regulate tRNA import. So the fine-tuning observed in Chlamydomonas mitochondria between tRNA import and the codon usage appear to originate from a co-evolution process rather from a dynamic adaptation of cytosolic tRNA import into mitochondria. Future work on the understanding of how this co-evolution works in plants should focus on the characterization of the tRNA import machinery and more precisely on the first stages of tRNA import (i.e. during their targeting from the nucleus to the mitochondrial surface). This would undoubtedly give a more comprehensive picture of how tRNA import regulation into mitochondria is achieved.

Materials and Methods

Strains and growth conditions

The following mitochondrial mutants of C. reinhardtii were used as recipient for the biolistic transformation: dum11 that exhibits a 1.2 kb deletion extending beyond codon 147 of cob and responsible for loss of complex III activity and the dum22 mutant possessing a deletion extending beyond the 3′end of nd4 sequence and responsible for loss of complex I and III activity. Cells were routinely grown at 25°C under heterotrophic (dark + acetate) or mixotrophic (light + acetate) conditions. Light conditions were 50 µE m−2 s−1 and Tris-acetate phosphate (TAP) medium [33] was used.

Plasmids used for Chlamydomonas mitochondrial transformation

The pND4-LP, the pCucob and the pCumut constructs were purchased from ATG-biosynthetics Company (https://www.atg-biosynthetics.com/). The pND4-LP construct corresponds to the first 4966 bp of the mitochondrial genome, including the left telomere, the cob gene, the nd4 gene and the nd5 gene [22]. The pCucob construct corresponds to the first 1900 bp of the mitochondrial genome, including the left telomere, the mutated version of cob gene and 187 bp of the nd4 gene cloned into EcoRV/SpeI digested pUC57 vector. The pCumut construct corresponds to the 5400 bp of the mitochondrial genome, including the left telomere, the cob gene, the mutated version of nd4 gene, the mutated version of the nd5 gene and 335 bp of the cox1 gene cloned into EcoRI/PstI digested pSB3C5 vector. The mutated version of cob gene, nd4 gene and nd5 gene in pCucob and pCumut constructs correspond to genes in which the GGC/GGT codons were replaced by GGG codons. For mitochondrial transformation, pND4-LP, pCucob and pCumut constructs were linearized by BglI, DraI, PvuII enzymes respectively.

Mitochondrial transformation procedures

Cells were grown in liquid TAP medium up to exponential phase (2–3×106 cells) and spread at high density on TAP plates (108 cells per plate). Plates were bombarded with tungsten beads coated with linearized DNA at a concentration of 1 µg/µL by using a Bio-Rad PDS-1000He apparatus under a pressure of 1,100 psi and a partial vacuum in the chamber corresponding to a reading of at least 29 inches Hg, according to [21].

DNA, RNA, and PCR analyses

C. reinhardtii total nucleic acids were prepared according to [34]. For Southern blot analyses, total DNA (10 µg) was digested by SacI enzyme, separated on 0.8% agarose gel and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For Northern blot analyses, total RNA (15 µg) was separated on 0.8% agarose-formaldehyde gel and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane. Digoxigenin-labeled PCR products of cDNA fragments were used as gene probes and detected with anti-digoxigenin-AP conjugates and CSPD as substrate (Roche Molecular Biology). For PCR analyses, amplification was made either with total DNA or directly with Chlamydomonas colonies according to a protocol derived from [35]. Sequencing was performed directly on amplified products by Beckman Coulter Genomics (Essex, UK).

Whole-cell respiration

Dark respiration rates of cells that were grown mixotrophically i.e. TAP medium in the light, were measured using a Clark electrode (Hansatech Instruments, King's Lynn, England) as described in [26].

Enzyme activities

Enzyme activity analyses were performed on membrane fractions prepared as described in [23]. NADH:ferricyanide oxidoreductase, complex I (rotenone-sensitive NADH:duroquinone oxidoreductase), complex II + III (succinate:cytochrome c oxidoreductase), and complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) activities were measured following published procedures [23], [24].

Purification of mitochondria

Crude mitochondrial fractions were isolated from cell wall-less Chlamydomonas T22-WT and T22-11 strains by digitonin treatment according to [24]. The mitochondrial fraction was then loaded on a discontinuous Percoll gradient (13%/21%/45%). Purified mitochondria were recovered at the 45/21 interface and washed two times in MET buffer containing 280 mM Mannitol, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.1% BSA by 10 min centrifugation at 11000 g.

Protein complex analysis

Protein complex analyses were conducted on purified mitochondria and the protein content was determined according to [36].

To conduct blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) analyses, protein complexes from purified mitochondria were solubilized in the presence of 1.5% (weight/volume) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside, 375 mM 6-aminohexanoic acid, 250 mM EDTA and 25 mM Bis-Tris pH 7.0. Solubilized protein complexes were centrifuged for 20 min at 15000 g at 4°C to remove insoluble matters. One percent (weight/volume) of Coomassie Blue G was then added to the supernatant prior to separation by electrophoresis on a 4 to 12% acrylamide gradient BN gel [37]. Coomassie Blue staining and in-gel detection of NADH dehydrogenase, ATP synthase or complex IV activities were performed as described in [23]. SDS-PAGE was performed according to standard protocols. Polyclonal antibodies directed against the Chlamydomonas 49 kDa subunit (1:3000), against the Chlamydomonas β subunit of the mitochondrial ATP synthase (1:150000), against the Cox3 subunit of S. cerevisiae (1:1000) and against the Chlamydomonas VdacI protein (1:20000) were used for Western blotting analyses.

MitoTracker staining and confocal microscopy

Synchronized cells (1.108) were washed once with TAP medium then incubated in the dark for 30 min in TAP medium added with 1 µM of MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). Stained cells were washed with TAP medium and living cells were directly observed on Superfrost plus slide (Menzel-Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany). For living cell imaging, a Leica TCS SP5-II AOBS inverted confocal laser microscope (Leica Microsystems) and a 63×1.2 numerical aperture Plan-Apo water-immersion objective were used to collect images at 1024×1024 pixel resolution. MitoTracker Orange was detected by using an excitation wavelength of 543 and the fluorescence emission was dispersed and recorded at 550–590 nm. The autofluorescence of chlorophyll was detected by using an excitation wavelength of 488 and the fluorescence emission was dispersed and recorded at 650–750 nm. The diameter of the pinhole was set equal to the Airy unit, and we ensured that the maximal fluorescence signal was not saturating the photomultiplier tubes. A series of optical sections were taken to analyze the spatial distribution of mitochondria, they were recorded with a Z-step of 0.5 µm.

Northern analysis and quantitation of tRNA import

Mitochondrial tRNAs were extracted from the T22-WT and T22-11 strains according to [20]. Mitochondrial tRNAs (1.5 µg) were fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For hybridizations, radiolabeled tRNA specific oligonucleotides were used as probes (Table S1). Hybridization and washing were performed as described in [20]. For each specific probe, signals detected with a FLA-7000 phosphor imager (Fujifilm) were quantified using the software ImageGauge (Fujifilm).

In organello protein synthesis

In organello protein synthesis experiments were performed as described in [38]. One hundred µg of mitochondrial proteins were resuspended in a solution containing 5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0, 300 mM Mannitol, 60 mM KCl, 50 mM Hepes, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Na-malate, 10 mM Na-pyruvate, 2 mM GTP, 2 mM DTT, 4 mM ADP, 0.1% (w/v) BSA, 25 µM of an unlabeled 19-amino acid mix solution, and 30 µCi (>1000 Ci/mmol 35S-Methionine). Reactions were performed in 100 µL for 60 min at 25°C with gentle shaking. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 mL MET buffer containing 10 mM of Methionine. After 5 min centrifugation at 11000 g, the mitochondrial pellet was analyzed on SDS-PAGE.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Alignment of the wild-type and the modified genes. Modified nucleic acids are indicated in white.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

Alignment of the wild-type and the modified nd4 gene. Modified nucleic acids are indicated in white. Position and name of the oligonucleotides specific for modified nd4 gene are indicated by a long arrow. The ten modified GGC/GGT codons into GGG codons in the T11-10 transformant are framed in grey. The additional codon found in the T22-11 transformant is framed in black.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.s002

(PDF)

Figure S3.

Alignment of the wild-type and the modified nd5 gene. Modified nucleic acids are indicated in white. Position and name of oligonucleotides specific for modified nd5 gene are indicated by a long arrow.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.s003

(PDF)

Table S1.

Oligonucleotides used for molecular characterization of the transformants. Position indicates the location of the oligonucleotide in the Chlamydomonas mitochondrial genome according to the GenBank u03843 numbering.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.s004

(PDF)

Table S2.

Oligonucleotides used for Northern analysis on mitochondrial tRNA fractions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002946.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We warmly thank M. Radoux, E. Ubrig, and F. Crins for helpful technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TS FD VL NC NB PM LM-D CR. Performed the experiments: TS FD VL NC NB PM LM-D CR. Analyzed the data: TS FD VL NC NB PM LM-D CR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TS FD VL NC NB PM LM-D CR. Wrote the paper: TS LM-D CR.

References

  1. 1. Cavalier-Smith T (1987) Eukaryotes with no mitochondria. Nature 326: 332–333. doi: 10.1038/326332a0
  2. 2. Lithgow T, Schneider A (2010) Evolution of macromolecular import pathways in mitochondria, hydrogenosomes and mitosomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 799–817. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0167
  3. 3. O'Brien EA, Zhang Y, Yang L, Wang E, Marie V, et al. (2006) GOBASE–a database of organelle and bacterial genome information. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D697–699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj098
  4. 4. Kamenski P, Kolesnikova O, Jubenot V, Entelis N, Krasheninnikov IA, et al. (2007) Evidence for an adaptation mechanism of mitochondrial translation via tRNA import from the cytosol. Mol Cell 26: 625–637. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.019
  5. 5. Rubio MA, Rinehart JJ, Krett B, Duvezin-Caubet S, Reichert AS, et al. (2008) Mammalian mitochondria have the innate ability to import tRNAs by a mechanism distinct from protein import. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 9186–9191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804283105
  6. 6. Duchêne AM, Pujol C, Maréchal-Drouard L (2009) Import of tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases into mitochondria. Curr Genet 55: 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s00294-008-0223-9
  7. 7. Sieber F, Duchêne AM, Maréchal-Drouard L (2011) Mitochondrial RNA import: from diversity of natural mechanisms to potential applications. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 287: 145–190. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386043-9.00004-9
  8. 8. Schneider A (2011) Mitochondrial tRNA import and its consequences for mitochondrial translation. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 1033–1053. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-092838
  9. 9. Salinas T, Duchêne AM, Maréchal-Drouard L (2008) Recent advances in tRNA mitochondrial import. Trends Biochem Sci 33: 320–329. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.010
  10. 10. Rubio MA, Hopper AK (2011) Transfer RNA travels from the cytoplasm to organelles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2: 802–817. doi: 10.1002/wrna.93
  11. 11. Kapushoc ST, Alfonzo JD, Simpson L (2002) Differential localization of nucleus-encoded tRNAs between the cytosol and mitochondrion in Leishmania tarentolae. Rna 8: 57–68. doi: 10.1017/s1355838202012281
  12. 12. Suyama Y, Wong S, Campbell DA (1998) Regulated tRNA import in Leishmania mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1396: 138–142. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(97)00197-8
  13. 13. Tan TH, Pach R, Crausaz A, Ivens A, Schneider A (2002) tRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei: genomic organization, expression, and mitochondrial import. Mol Cell Biol 22: 3707–3717. doi: 10.1128/mcb.22.11.3707-3716.2002
  14. 14. Salinas T, Schaeffer C, Maréchal-Drouard L, Duchêne AM (2005) Sequence dependence of tRNA(Gly) import into tobacco mitochondria. Biochimie 87: 863–872. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2005.04.004
  15. 15. Glover KE, Spencer DF, Gray MW (2001) Identification and structural characterization of nucleus-encoded transfer RNAs imported into wheat mitochondria. J Biol Chem 276: 639–648. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m007708200
  16. 16. Duchêne AM, El Farouk-Ameqrane S, Sieber F, Maréchal-Drouard L (2011) Import of RNAs into plant mitochondria; Kempken F, editor: Springer. 535 p.
  17. 17. Ikemura T (1985) Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol 2: 13–34.
  18. 18. Kanaya S, Yamada Y, Kudo Y, Ikemura T (1999) Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis. Gene 238: 143–155. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00225-5
  19. 19. Michaelis G, Vahrenholz C, Pratje E (1990) Mitochondrial DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: the gene for apocytochrome b and the complete functional map of the 15.8 kb DNA. Mol Gen Genet 223: 211–216. doi: 10.1007/bf00265056
  20. 20. Vinogradova E, Salinas T, Cognat V, Remacle C, Maréchal-Drouard L (2009) Steady-state levels of imported tRNAs in Chlamydomonas mitochondria are correlated with both cytosolic and mitochondrial codon usages. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1521–1528. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1073
  21. 21. Remacle C, Cardol P, Coosemans N, Gaisne M, Bonnefoy N (2006) High-efficiency biolistic transformation of Chlamydomonas mitochondria can be used to insert mutations in complex I genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 4771–4776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509501103
  22. 22. Larosa V, Coosemans N, Motte P, Bonnefoy N, Remacle C (2012) Reconstruction of a human mitochondrial complex I mutation in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas. Plant J 70: 759–768. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.04912.x
  23. 23. Remacle C, Baurain D, Cardol P, Matagne RF (2001) Mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii deficient in mitochondrial complex I: characterization of two mutations affecting the nd1 coding sequence. Genetics 158: 1051–1060.
  24. 24. Cardol P, Matagne RF, Remacle C (2002) Impact of mutations affecting ND mitochondria-encoded subunits on the activity and assembly of complex I in Chlamydomonas. Implication for the structural organization of the enzyme. J Mol Biol 319: 1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00407-2
  25. 25. Cardol P, Boutaffala L, Memmi S, Devreese B, Matagne RF, et al. (2008) In Chlamydomonas, the loss of ND5 subunit prevents the assembly of whole mitochondrial complex I and leads to the formation of a low abundant 700 kDa subcomplex. Biochim Biophys Acta 1777: 388–396. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.01.001
  26. 26. Duby F, Matagne RF (1999) Alteration of dark respiration and reduction of phototrophic growth in a mitochondrial DNA deletion mutant of Chlamydomonas lacking cob, nd4, and the 3′ end of nd5. Plant Cell 11: 115–125. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.1.115
  27. 27. Qian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J (2012) Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet 8: e1002603 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002603.
  28. 28. Cognat V, Deragon JM, Vinogradova E, Salinas T, Remacle C, et al. (2008) On the evolution and expression of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii nucleus-encoded transfer RNA genes. Genetics 179: 113–123. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.085688
  29. 29. Grosjean H, de Crecy-Lagard V, Marck C (2010) Deciphering synonymous codons in the three domains of life: co-evolution with specific tRNA modification enzymes. FEBS Lett 584: 252–264. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.052
  30. 30. Rogalski M, Karcher D, Bock R (2008) Superwobbling facilitates translation with reduced tRNA sets. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 192–198. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1370
  31. 31. Brubacher-Kauffmann S, Maréchal-Drouard L, Cosset A, Dietrich A, Duchêne AM (1999) Differential import of nucleus-encoded tRNAGly isoacceptors into Solanum tuberosum mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 2037–2042. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.9.2037
  32. 32. Leihne V, Kirpekar F, Vagbo CB, van den Born E, Krokan HE, et al. (2011) Roles of Trm9- and ALKBH8-like proteins in the formation of modified wobble uridines in Arabidopsis tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 7688–7701. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr406
  33. 33. Harris EH (1989) The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook. San Diego: Academic Press.
  34. 34. Newman SM, Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Randolph-Anderson BL, Johnson AM, et al. (1990) Transformation of chloroplast ribosomal RNA genes in Chlamydomonas: molecular and genetic characterization of integration events. Genetics 126: 875–888.
  35. 35. Randolph-Anderson BL, Boynton JE, Gillham NW, Harris EH, Johnson AM, et al. (1993) Further characterization of the respiratory deficient dum-1 mutation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and its use as a recipient for mitochondrial transformation. Mol Gen Genet 236: 235–244. doi: 10.1007/bf00277118
  36. 36. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999
  37. 37. Schagger H, von Jagow G (1991) Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal Biochem 199: 223–231. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90094-a
  38. 38. Leaver CJ, Hack E, Forde BG (1983) Protein synthesis by isolated plant mitochondria. Methods Enzymol 97: 476–484. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)97156-2