Advertisement
Research Article

Loss of Gnas Imprinting Differentially Affects REM/NREM Sleep and Cognition in Mice

  • Glenda Lassi,

    Affiliation: Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy

    X
  • Simon T. Ball,

    Affiliation: Medical Research Council Mammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell, United Kingdom

    X
  • Silvia Maggi,

    Affiliation: Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy

    X
  • Giovanni Colonna,

    Affiliation: Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy

    X
  • Thierry Nieus,

    Affiliation: Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy

    X
  • Cheryl Cero,

    Affiliation: Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America

    X
  • Alessandro Bartolomucci,

    Affiliation: Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America

    X
  • Jo Peters,

    Affiliation: Medical Research Council Mammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell, United Kingdom

    X
  • Valter Tucci mail

    valter.tucci@iit.it

    Affiliation: Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy

    X
  • Published: May 10, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706

Abstract

It has been suggested that imprinted genes are important in the regulation of sleep. However, the fundamental question of whether genomic imprinting has a role in sleep has remained elusive up to now. In this work we show that REM and NREM sleep states are differentially modulated by the maternally expressed imprinted gene Gnas. In particular, in mice with loss of imprinting of Gnas, NREM and complex cognitive processes are enhanced while REM and REM–linked behaviors are inhibited. This is the first demonstration that a specific overexpression of an imprinted gene affects sleep states and related complex behavioral traits. Furthermore, in parallel to the Gnas overexpression, we have observed an overexpression of Ucp1 in interscapular brown adipose tissue (BAT) and a significant increase in thermoregulation that may account for the REM/NREM sleep phenotypes. We conclude that there must be significant evolutionary advantages in the monoallelic expression of Gnas for REM sleep and for the consolidation of REM–dependent memories. Conversely, biallelic expression of Gnas reinforces slow wave activity in NREM sleep, and this results in a reduction of uncertainty in temporal decision-making processes.

Author Summary

REM and NREM sleep are two distinct stages of the sleeping brain that are involved in the modulation of metabolic, physiological, and cognitive processes. Clinical evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, such as genomic imprinting, play a role in sleep. Here we show that REM and NREM brain states are differentially modulated by the maternally imprinted gene Gnas. In particular, a mutation resulting in loss of imprinted expression of Gnas enhances NREM–dependent physiologic and cognitive functions while repressing REM and REM-linked functions. This is the first experimental demonstration of a specific effect of genomic imprinting on sleep states and their associated effects on cognition.

Introduction

Mammalian evolution from the reptile lineage involved important changes in gene regulation and sleep. Many genetic mechanisms play important roles in various electrophysiological and behavioral traits that set the three major states of mammalian life: Wakefulness, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) and Non-REM (NREM) sleep [1], [2]. However, here we focus on a particular gene regulation, namely genomic imprinting. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that results in allele-specific expression of some genes according to parental origin and, in vertebrates, is unique to mammals.

Clinical observations of neurodevelopmental disorders of sleep suggest a role of genomic imprinting on various measures of sleep [3], [4]. For example, Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS), both neurodevelopmental syndromes, exhibit opposing imprinting profiles and opposing sleep phenotypes. PWS is associated with maternal duplications/paternal deletions of alleles on chromosome 15q11–13 and is characterized by temperature control abnormalities and excessive sleepiness as well as REM sleep abnormalities [5][8]. Conversely, AS is associated with paternal duplications/maternal deletions on chromosome 15q11–13 and is characterized by severe mental retardation and reductions in sleep. The UBE3A gene, that resides in the PWS/AS imprinting region, has been associated to sleep abnormalities. Ube3a deficient mice are characterized by reduced NREM sleep, deteriorated REM sleep, and an increased frequency of waking during the dark–light transition [9].

Interestingly, the serotonin (5-HT) 2A receptors, which mediate aminergic inhibition of REM-on cells in the parabrachialis lateralis region [10], are primarily expressed from maternal alleles [11], [12]. The above reviewed findings support the idea that epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, such as genomic imprinting, influence sleep-associated mechanisms.

REM and NREM sleep underlie important metabolic, physiological and cognitive processes. REM sleep influences early postnatal developmental behaviors; it facilitates the acquisition of resources from the mother (i.e. by means of suckling behavior) and it promotes the release of hormones such as prolactin and oxytocin which are pivotal in the development of attachment behavior [4]. From an evolutionary and behavioral perspective, REM sleep has been associated with adult reproductive success [4]. NREM sleep is associated with more stable metabolic and autonomic responses compared to REM sleep. Furthermore, the presence of REM-like and NREM-like states has been associated with nutritive behaviors in offspring and mother, respectively [4].

Recent advances in functional studies of sleep strongly suggest that memory consolidation benefits from a slow (<1 Hz) highly synchronized cortical activity in NREM and from subcortical theta (5–9 Hz) rhythms in REM sleep [13]. Despite these advances in functional understanding of REM and NREM sleep states, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of sleep-dependent plasticity and memory processing are not currently well understood.

Here we report, for the first time, experimental evidence for a role of an imprinted gene, Gnas, in the modulation of REM/NREM sleep physiology. Gnas encodes the stimulatory G-protein subunit Gsα, which is involved in the generation of intracellular cyclic AMP and plays a crucial role in energy expenditure and metabolism by mediating sympathetic effects on many tissues [14]. It is biallelically expressed in most tissues including adult white adipose tissue [15] but it is predominantly maternally expressed and paternally repressed in a subset of tissues such as neonatal brown adipose tissue (BAT) [16], although it is not known if it shows imprinted expression in adult BAT. BAT produces heat by fatty acid oxidation and serves a pivotal thermoregulatory function within the organism [17]. Thanks to the rich presence of mitochondria and by means of the uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1), BAT is implicated in non-shivering thermogenesis [15], [18].

Imprinted expression of Gnas is controlled by a cis-acting differentially methylated region (DMR): the Exon1A-DMR [16]. Paternal transmission of a deletion of the Exon1A-DMR (Gnastm1Jop, hereafter called Ex1a, see Figure 1a) causes derepression of the normally repressed paternal Gnas allele in imprinted tissues resulting in biallelic Gnas expression and loss of imprinting [16]. We show here, for the first time, that loss of imprinting of Gnas results in specific abnormalities in sleep, cognition and thermoregulation in adult mice.

thumbnail

Figure 1. Exon 1A deletion: Gnas expression and body temperature.

(a) Representation of Gnas expression when the Exon1A-DMR (Ex1A-DMR) is methylated on the maternal (M) allele in +/+ and +/Ex1a or deleted on the paternal (P) allele in +/Ex1a mice. (b) Expression levels, by q-PCR measurements, in BAT tissue of Gnas (left panel) and Ucp1 (right panel) mRNA in +/+ versus mutant +/Ex1a mice. (c) Grand-averages and shadowed ± s.e.m. of body temperature over a 24-hour period for +/+ and +/Ex1a mice. Statistics are reported as following: t-test; ** = P<0.01.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.g001

Results

On paternal inheritance of the deletion, we have observed that in +/Ex1a mice the level of Gnas mRNA expression is increased, compared to littermate controls, in adult BAT (Figure 1b) indicating a derepression on the paternal allele due to a loss of Gnas imprinting, as previously reported in newborn mice BAT [16]. Moreover, we show here that Ucp1 mRNA in BAT is significantly higher in +/Ex1a mice compared to littermate controls (Figure 1b). As expected from the observation of increased Ucp1 levels a significantly higher body temperature was found in mutant animals (Figure 1c). The major increase of temperature in +/Ex1a mice compared to littermate controls occurs at the end of the subjective day and at the beginning of the subjective night, when there is a strong urge to sleep (Figure 1c).

In order to investigate the sleep-wake profile and the behavioral performance in these mice, we subjected adult +/Ex1a mice and +/+ littermate controls to behavioral and electrophysiological investigation in the home-cage environment. Interestingly, the total REM sleep was significantly reduced in +/Ex1a mice compared to littermate controls (Figure 2a) while the total NREM was unaffected between the two groups (Figure 2b). However, at the electrophysiological level, the contribution (power density) of delta (1–4 Hz) frequencies, the main synchronized rhythm in NREM sleep, was higher in the +/Ex1a mice compared to +/+ mice (Figure 3).

thumbnail

Figure 2. Sleep architecture in Exon 1A mice.

Four-hour bins percentage and ± s.e.m., shadowed, of REM (a) and NREM (b) sleep for a 48-hour period.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.g002
thumbnail

Figure 3. Representation of EEG frequencies in REM and NREM sleep.

Here is represented the power density (see Methods) for all frequencies in all 4-seconds REM (blue line) and NREM (red line) sleep epochs during a 48-hour baseline.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.g003

A 6-hour sleep deprivation protocol triggered, immediately after deprivation, a significantly increase (rebound) of REM in +/Ex1a mice, which testifies the need for a homeostatic recovery of REM, but not for NREM sleep, in mutants (Figure S1 and Figure S2). No differences in body temperature occurred during sleep deprivation and during the following recovery period between the two groups (Figure S2).

Thus, we extended our investigation into specific REM/NREM-dependent behavioral functions. We subjected mice to a classical memory task, the fear conditioning (FC) test, which affects REM sleep homeostasis [19]. After the first (conditioning) day of the FC protocol, we have observed an increase of REM sleep but not of NREM sleep in +/+ mice (Figure S1aS1b). The presence of REM and its theta density were significantly higher in +/+ compared to +/Ex1a mice (Figure S1b). We suggest that this lack of REM increase in mutants is the causal mechanism explaining the reduced freezing behavior in +/Ex1a mice, compared to controls, that occurred when the animals were exposed to the same context (Figure 4) the following day. Indeed, the consolidation of fear responses has been previously associated with REM mechanisms that occur during sleep [19]. Because no difference between the two groups was observed in the cue condition (day 3) we reason that the deficit in in +/Ex1a mice is restricted to context-dependent mechanism, which has been previously associated with REM/fear memory consolidation [20], [21].

thumbnail

Figure 4. Fear conditioning performance.

(a) Representation of the FC protocol over three days and three different experimental phases (Conditioning, Context and Cue). (b) Mean percentage values of freezing behavior ± s.e.m. are plotted for each experimental phase. Statistics are reported as following: t-test; * = P<0.05.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.g004

A different subset of mice was tested in their home-cage with a cortico-striatal cognitive task, the “Switch-test” [22]. The test requires the animal to decide to nose-poke in different hoppers within the home-cage in response to a short- versus a long-light signal to obtain a reward (Figure 5a). Optimal performance in this task implies that the animal has learnt to distinguish between a short-signal associated with the reward coming at the hopper in one of the two locations and a long-signal associated with the reward coming at the hopper in the other location. This test of cognitive performance assesses whether the animal has an accurate representation of both endogenous/implicit (the subjective estimation of the signal duration) and exogenous/explicit (the ratio between short and long signals) temporal variables. In one condition (the “Switch” condition) all trials resulted in a reward if the animal responded correctly. In a second condition (the “Probes” condition) a percentage of trials was never rewarded regardless of the response of the animal. This latter condition was to measure the animal's uncertainty and its cognitive performance during a temporal decision making process [23]. Interestingly, +/Ex1a mice performed better in each phase of the experiment showing higher accuracy and time precision compared to controls (Figure 5b–5d). As expected, this 24-hour home-cage cognitive effort triggered a significant NREM increase and a higher delta power in +/Ex1a mice compared to +/+ mice in both “Switch” and “Probes” conditions (Figure S1aS1c). Notably, the “Probes” condition, which added a degree of uncertainty to the expectation of obtaining a reward, resulted in an more severe augmentation of NREM sleep respect to the “Switch” condition. REM did not change significantly following both conditions neither in +/+ or +/Ex1a mice (Figure S1aS1c).

thumbnail

Figure 5. Cognitive performance in Exon 1A mice and littermate controls.

(a) A schematic representation of the “switch task” in which a mouse self-initiates the trial (“START”) and receives a reward according to the duration of the signal (“short-latency” versus “long-latency”) and the location (“A” or “B”). (b) The cumulative distribution of all switch latencies (the time at which the mouse stops nose poking in the short-location and moves to the long location) for all long-signal trials are reported for the +/Ex1a mice and their littermate controls. (c) From the above cumulative distribution of the switch latencies we have derived the Time Accuracy (TA), as the median (Q0.5), and the Time Precision (TP), as the difference of the third and first inter-quartiles (Q0.75−Q0.25), similar to what is described in [22]. Box-plots of TAs (the median values for each subject) and TPs (the inter-quartiles) are shown as well as (d) the percentage of correct versus error trials for the whole experiment. The correct/error trials graph refers only to the “Switch” condition, however, the same trend was observed in the “Probes” condition.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.g005

Discussion

We have shown here clear evidence for an involvement of the imprinted Gnas transcript in the modulation of sleep and sleep-dependent behaviors.

Our study demonstrated a close link between sleep and thermoregulation. Temperature control is a well-known mechanism that modulates the expression of REM/NREM sleep in humans and mice [24]. When the thermoregulatory demand increases, REM sleep diminishes in rodents [24][26]. Hence, the increase of body temperature in +/Ex1a accounts for the significant reduction of REM sleep that we have observed in these mutants. Moreover, several studies have shown that an increase in body temperature is associated with an increase in NREM sleep propensity [24], [27][29]. Thus, the hyperthermic phenotype is responsible for the REM defect-NREM improvement that we observed in +/Ex1a mice, indicating a link between imprinted Gnas, thermoregulation and REM/NREM sleep [24]. The molecular pathway joining Gnas and thermoregulation in BAT is well understood. Gsα is considered an important mediator of the activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) on many functions of BAT, included thermogenesis and energy expenditure [30]. SNS stimulation of BAT leads to thermogenesis. Gsα is a constituent of transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors that translate adrenergic SNS stimulation, in BAT, to the activation of UCP1 via specific intracellular changes and a signaling cascade that involves the production of cAMP and activation of protein kinase A (PKA). Our results showing increased Gnas - Ucp1 expression are in line with a specific SNS-molecularly mediated cAMP-PKA role in non-shivering thermogenesis and therefore sleep. Indeed, the intracellular activity of cAMP-PKA is inversely related to the urge to sleep. In particular, an increased PKA affects sleep according to the specific cells in which it is expressed [31][33]. A reduced REM sleep would, presumably, be associated with an elevated cAMP-PKA activity.

We have shown that functional monoallelic expression of Gnas, due to imprinting of this gene, is important, in mice, for the physiology of REM sleep and for the consolidation of fear conditioning contextual memories. Many experimental observations support the idea that hippocampus is crucial for the development of contextual fear conditioning [20], [34]. However, fear conditioning responses are mediated by a complex interaction within limbic and prelimbic areas and this is also modulated by circadian genes [35]. As Chen and colleagues [36], have shown that Gnas is not imprinted in the hippocampus, our study implies that this specific cognitive phenotype must be due to imprinting of Gnas in brain regions other than hippocampus. Within this same study it was shown that Gnas is imprinted in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, a brain region that subserves important metabolic functions [36]. The PVN receives important projections from neurons located within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, the master clock for circadian rhythms [37]. The interaction between PVN and SCN is important in orchestrating circadian rhythms and to set proper neuroendocrine responses to stressors [37]. Thus loss of Gnas imprinting, within these structures, can be envisaged as playing a role in both sleep and behavior. The results of our study confirm the idea that REM sleep is fundamental in the consolidation of fear responses [19], likely, involving a complex network of brain activity.

We have also shown that NREM functions are sensitive to Gnas dosage but, in this case, loss of imprinting of Gnas results in a reduction of uncertainty in temporal decision making. This improvement is paralleled by an increased contribution of slow wave activity in NREM sleep. Our result is consistent with the idea that cortical slow oscillations, by modulating synaptic circuits between subcortical and cortical structures, are responsible for the consolidation of daily memories during sleep [13].

In conclusion, in our study, loss of imprinting of Gnas, inhibits REM and primitive REM-linked functions, such as the fear response to a threatening context. Conversely, it enhances NREM physiology and high-level cognitive functions that developed alongside a progressively complex brain.

However, from a behavioral point of view an increased precision in interval timing estimation does not necessarily result in a better performance in other behavioral responses. Indeed, if the subject is less certain about the time of the foot-shock, its fear conditioning response may start earlier and stop later [38], hence resulting in a higher freezing time. Perhaps, evolution has developed a balanced mechanism between temporal uncertainty and fear behavioral responses and then loss of imprinting, in +/Ex1a mice, involves a reduction of freezing because of a higher timing precision. Thus, REM/NREM sleep expression may favor this well-adjusted mechanism.

The results of our study indicate a specific role for the imprinted gene Gnas in thermoregulation, which in turn affects REM/NREM sleep and then, cognitive performance. In addition we also reported a novel effect of specific cognitive mechanisms on sleep, by showing that a specific decision making process, the consolidation of an interval timing task, influences NREM sleep. Furthermore, in our mouse mutant model, the particular NREM physiology, exacerbates the effect of cognition on sleep homeostasis. This study attests the relevance of Gnas in brain functions and that loss of imprinting of Gnas affects cognitive processes.

Another transcript within the Gnas locus, the paternally expressed transcript Gnasxl, is expressed in specific sleep-related brain areas including the locus ceruleus and cholinergic laterodorsal tegmental nuclei [39]. The activity of neurons in the cholinergic laterodorsal tegmental nucleus is particularly important in the regulation of REM sleep [40], [41]. Mice with mutations in paternally derived Gnasxl transcripts show phenotypic deficits associated with growth and development, which is a critical stage for REM sleep across many species [4]. Thus Gnasxl may also play a role in sleep.

Methods

Mouse breeding, genotyping, and procedures

Initial Ex1a stock mice were produced in MRC-Harwell on 129/SvEv background and then transferred to IIT. In IIT mice were bred and maintained, through paternal inheritance, for several generations on C57BL/6J background, as this is a favorite background for behavioral studies. The genotyping of the mice was conducted following the assay as indicated in [42]: Exon1aF 5′cagtcgcgtcggcaccgcggag3′ and Exon1aR 5′gacgcactcacacgcaaagcag3′.

All the behavioral and electrophysiological experiments, in adult +/Ex1a mice and +/+ littermate controls, were conducted in the home-cage environment. In addition, mRNA expression profiles for Gnas and Uncoupling Protein (Ucp)1 were made in naïve adult mice. Each experiment included 8 male mice (10-weeks old) for each genotype and all procedures were done under the guidance issued by the UK authority (Project Licence Numbers 30/2526) and under the Italian Policy (licence issued on 19/06/2009, decreto N°106/2009-B).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from about 0.2 g of snap frozen brown adipose tissue (BAT) and homogenized using Pestel with Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to isolate total RNA according to the manufacturer's procedure. Q-PCR was conducted essentially as previously described [43], [44]. Specific primers were: UCP1:f5′-GTCCCCTGCCATTTACTGTCAG-3′, r5′-TTTATTCGTGGTCTCCCAGCATAG-3′; GNAS: f5′-AGAAGGACAAGCAGGTCTACCG-3′, r5′-GTTAAACCCATTAACATGCAGGA-3′; β-actin, f5′-GGCACCACACCTTCTACAATG-3′, r5′-GGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAAC-3′. Thermal cycling parameters were: denaturation 95°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturing- annealing and extending (95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and then 70°C for 1 min). The results were calculated by the comparative Ct method according to the Applied Biosystems ABI-PRISM-7700 User Bulletin#2. Each sample was run in quadruplicate to obtain average Ct values and a ΔCt value for the target gene of the same sample, normalizing each sample to β-actin. The expression relative to β-actin was determined by calculating 2−ΔCt. Mean comparison was performed with unpaired Student's t-test.

Behavioral experiment

Mice were subjected to a long-term investigation in home-cage environment after the implant of a wireless system (Data Sciences) that enables to record electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), locomotor activity and body temperature for off-line sleep-stage analysis (see [19]). Automated sleep scoring followed by visual manual inspection was performed using all sleep criteria for mice [19]. We performed Fast Fourier Transform analysis of the EEG signals with SleepSign software. The contributions of EEG frequencies was expressed as power densities in each frequency bin in all NREM and REM sleep epochs (as described in [45]).

A 2 week post-surgery period of recovery were given to each mouse to ensure a full recovery of normal sleep. At the end of the recovery period, we started recording all the physiological signals uninterruptedly for 48 consecutive hours (sleep baseline). Then, mice went under 6-hour sleep deprivation (SD) and 6-hour recovery period. After an additional 1-week the mice underwent fear conditioning (FC) or timing learning (Switch task) conditions.

The “Switch task.”.

Mice were maintained in home-cage (equipped with a novel three-hopper operant wall from TSE) to perform in the switch task [22], The test requires the animal to decide to nose-poke in response to a light-signal to obtain a reward (Figure 5a). All trials were self-initiated by the animals by nose poking in one hopper (located in the middle of the operant wall) in the home-cage. The rewards were delivered through the two lateral hoppers; one hopper was always associated with short light-signals while the other hopper was always associated with long light-signals. On a fraction of the trials, the reward pellets were available in location “A” after a short-signal duration (3-seconds). On the other trials, the pellets were available after a long-signal duration (6-seconds) at the location “B”. If and when they reckoned that the short-latency had elapsed, they decided to leave the location “A” and move (switch) to the location “B”. The rewards were obtained only if the first nose poke of the animal occurred at the correct location. If mice switched too soon or too late for those long-signal trials, they ended up without payoff.

We trained all mice to a steady-state performance, keeping 1:3 ratio between short- and long- signals (3 vs. 9 sec respectively). Then we reduced the short-/long-signal ratio to 1:2 (3 vs. 6 sec), which is effectively similar to increased endogenous timing uncertainty (i.e. [23]). The test included two experimental conditions: “Switch” and “Probes”. The “Probes” condition differs from the “Switch” condition as we introduced 20% of no-reward(probe)-trials to independently test the timing uncertainty. We analysed for each condition the number of errors as well as switch latencies, time accuracy and time precision (as described in [22], [38]).

Fear conditioning.

Eight mice for each genotype were tested while on their active/dark phase. On day 1 each mouse was placed in a fear conditioning chamber and, after a 2-min baseline, were given four light/white-noise (55-dB) cue-stimuli lasting 30 s and overlapping in the last 2 s with a footshock, (0.5 mA) lasting further 2 s. Each pairing was 2 min apart (inter-trial interval). After a final 30 s post-footshock delay, mice were returned to their home cages. To test contextual memory, we placed the mice back in the original chamber (24-hr post-training, day 2) for 3 minutes with no footshock during which freezing bouts were scored. During day 3 we placed all mice, for 3 minutes, in the testing chamber but with a different context respect to the original one. During this exposure, we subjected all the animals to the light/white-noise cues of day 1 and we measured their freezing behavior.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Multiple-rebound values are plotted for NREM (a) and REM (b) after sleep deprivation (SD), FC and during the “Switch” and “Probes” condition of the Switch-task. The interrupted circular lines indicate the 100% baseline values. (c) Mean power densities of frequencies in NREM (red lines) and REM (blue lines) epochs are reported for all experimental conditions.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

Four-hour bins percentage and shadowed ± s.e.m of REM (lower panel) sleep during 6-hour sleep deprivation (SD) and the following 6-hour recovery period. Grand-averages and shadowed ± s.e.m. of body temperature (upper panel) are plotted for the same period.

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002706.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Bruce Cattanach, Pat Nolan, Fuat Balci and Randy Gallistel for critically reading of the manuscript and for discussions. We thank the Minnesota Obesity Center (NIH DK050456) for the use of the real-time PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VT. Performed the experiments: GL STB SM GC TN CC AB JP VT. Analyzed the data: GL SM TN AB VT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB JP VT. Wrote the paper: VT GL AB JP. Did all electrophysiological and behavioural experiments: GL. Created the animal model: STB JP. Analyzed the switching task data: SM TN. Contributed to the behavioral experiments: GC. Did the mRNA experiments: CC AB.

References

  1. 1. Cirelli C (2009) The genetic and molecular regulation of sleep: from fruit flies to humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 549–560.
  2. 2. Sehgal A, Mignot E (2011) Genetics of sleep and sleep disorders. Cell 146: 194–207.
  3. 3. McNamara P (2004) Genomic imprinting and neurodevelopmental disorders of sleep. Sleep and Hypnosis 6: 82–90.
  4. 4. McNamara P, Dowdall J, Auerbach S (2002) REM sleep, early experience, and the development of reproductive strategies. Human Nature 13: 405–435.
  5. 5. Vela-Bueno A, Kales A, Soldatos CR, Dobladez-Blanco B, Campos-Castello J, et al. (1984) Sleep in the Prader-Willi syndrome. Clinical and polygraphic findings. Arch Neurol 41: 294–296.
  6. 6. Hertz G, Cataletto M, Feinsilver SH, Angulo M (1993) Sleep and breathing patterns in patients with Prader Willi syndrome (PWS): effects of age and gender. Sleep 16: 366–371.
  7. 7. Vgontzas AN, Bixler EO, Kales A, Centurione A, Rogan PK, et al. (1996) Daytime sleepiness and REM abnormalities in Prader-Willi syndrome: evidence of generalized hypoarousal. Int J Neurosci 87: 127–139.
  8. 8. Vgontzas AN, Kales A, Seip J, Mascari MJ, Bixler EO, et al. (1996) Relationship of sleep abnormalities to patient genotypes in Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet 67: 478–482.
  9. 9. Colas D, Wagstaff J, Fort P, Salvert D, Sarda N (2005) Sleep disturbances in Ube3a maternal-deficient mice modeling Angelman syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 20: 471–478.
  10. 10. Amici R, Sanford LD, Kearney K, McInerney B, Ross RJ, et al. (2004) A serotonergic (5-HT2) receptor mechanism in the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus participates in regulating the pattern of rapid-eye-movement sleep occurrence in the rat. Brain Res 996: 9–18.
  11. 11. Kato MV, Shimizu T, Nagayoshi M, Kaneko A, Sasaki MS, et al. (1996) Genomic imprinting of the human serotonin-receptor (HTR2) gene involved in development of retinoblastoma. Am J Hum Genet 59: 1084–1090.
  12. 12. Kato MV, Ikawa Y, Hayashizaki Y, Shibata H (1998) Paternal imprinting of mouse serotonin receptor 2A gene Htr2 in embryonic eye: a conserved imprinting regulation on the RB/Rb locus. Genomics 47: 146–148.
  13. 13. Diekelmann S, Born J (2010) The memory function of sleep. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 114–126.
  14. 14. Chen M, Nemechek NM, Mema E, Wang J, Weinstein LS (2011) Effects of deficiency of the G protein Gsalpha on energy and glucose homeostasis. Eur J Pharmacol 660: 119–124.
  15. 15. Chen M, Chen H, Nguyen A, Gupta D, Wang J, et al. (2010) G(s)alpha deficiency in adipose tissue leads to a lean phenotype with divergent effects on cold tolerance and diet-induced thermogenesis. Cell Metab 11: 320–330.
  16. 16. Williamson CM, Ball ST, Nottingham WT, Skinner JA, Plagge A, et al. (2004) A cis-acting control region is required exclusively for the tissue-specific imprinting of Gnas. Nat Genet 36: 894–899.
  17. 17. Jakus PB, Sandor A, Janaky T, Farkas V (2008) Cooperation between BAT and WAT of rats in thermogenesis in response to cold, and the mechanism of glycogen accumulation in BAT during reacclimation. J Lipid Res 49: 332–339.
  18. 18. Cannon B, Nedergaard J (2004) Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev 84: 277–359.
  19. 19. Sanford LD, Yang L, Wellman LL, Liu X, Tang X (2010) Differential effects of controllable and uncontrollable footshock stress on sleep in mice. Sleep 33: 621–630.
  20. 20. Cai DJ, Shuman T, Harrison EM, Sage JR, Anagnostaras SG (2009) Sleep deprivation and Pavlovian fear conditioning. Learn Mem 16: 595–599.
  21. 21. Cai DJ, Mednick SA, Harrison EM, Kanady JC, Mednick SC (2009) REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 10130–10134.
  22. 22. Balci F, Freestone D, Gallistel CR (2009) Risk assessment in man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2459–2463.
  23. 23. Balci F, Simen P, Niyogi R, Saxe A, Hughes JA, et al. (2011) Acquisition of decision making criteria: reward rate ultimately beats accuracy. Atten Percept Psychophys 73: 640–657.
  24. 24. Krauchi K, Deboer T (2010) The interrelationship between sleep regulation and thermoregulation. Front Biosci 15: 604–625.
  25. 25. Valatx JL, Roussel B, Cure M (1973) [Sleep and cerebral temperature in rat during chronic heat exposure]. Brain Res 55: 107–122.
  26. 26. Amici R, Cerri M, Ocampo-Garces A, Baracchi F, Dentico D, et al. (2008) Cold exposure and sleep in the rat: REM sleep homeostasis and body size. Sleep 31: 708–715.
  27. 27. Morairty SR, Szymusiak R, Thomson D, McGinty DJ (1993) Selective increases in non-rapid eye movement sleep following whole body heating in rats. Brain Res 617: 10–16.
  28. 28. Gao BO, Franken P, Tobler I, Borbely AA (1995) Effect of elevated ambient temperature on sleep, EEG spectra, and brain temperature in the rat. Am J Physiol 268: R1365–1373.
  29. 29. Obal F Jr, Alfoldi P, Rubicsek G (1995) Promotion of sleep by heat in young rats. Pflugers Arch 430: 729–738.
  30. 30. Puigserver P, Spiegelman BM (2003) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha): transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr Rev 24: 78–90.
  31. 31. Hendricks JC, Williams JA, Panckeri K, Kirk D, Tello M, et al. (2001) A non-circadian role for cAMP signaling and CREB activity in Drosophila rest homeostasis. Nat Neurosci 4: 1108–1115.
  32. 32. Graves LA, Hellman K, Veasey S, Blendy JA, Pack AI, et al. (2003) Genetic evidence for a role of CREB in sustained cortical arousal. J Neurophysiol 90: 1152–1159.
  33. 33. Joiner WJ, Crocker A, White BH, Sehgal A (2006) Sleep in Drosophila is regulated by adult mushroom bodies. Nature 441: 757–760.
  34. 34. Anagnostaras SG, Gale GD, Fanselow MS (2001) Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: recent controversies and advances. Hippocampus 11: 8–17.
  35. 35. Garcia JA, Zhang D, Estill SJ, Michnoff C, Rutter J, et al. (2000) Impaired cued and contextual memory in NPAS2-deficient mice. Science 288: 2226–2230.
  36. 36. Chen M, Wang J, Dickerson KE, Kelleher J, Xie T, et al. (2009) Central nervous system imprinting of the G protein G(s)alpha and its role in metabolic regulation. Cell Metab 9: 548–555.
  37. 37. Buijs RM, van Eden CG, Goncharuk VD, Kalsbeek A (2003) The biological clock tunes the organs of the body: timing by hormones and the autonomic nervous system. J Endocrinol 177: 17–26.
  38. 38. Balci F, Papachristos EB, Gallistel CR, Brunner D, Gibson J, et al. (2008) Interval timing in genetically modified mice: a simple paradigm. Genes Brain Behav 7: 373–384.
  39. 39. Plagge A, Gordon E, Dean W, Boiani R, Cinti S, et al. (2004) The imprinted signaling protein XL alpha s is required for postnatal adaptation to feeding. Nat Genet 36: 818–826.
  40. 40. Berridge CW, Isaac SO, Espana RA (2003) Additive wake-promoting actions of medial basal forebrain noradrenergic alpha1- and beta-receptor stimulation. Behav Neurosci 117: 350–359.
  41. 41. Berridge CW (2008) Noradrenergic modulation of arousal. Brain Res Rev 58: 1–17.
  42. 42. Williamson CM, Turner MD, Ball ST, Nottingham WT, Glenister P, et al. (2006) Identification of an imprinting control region affecting the expression of all transcripts in the Gnas cluster. Nat Genet 38: 350–355.
  43. 43. Winn VD, Haimov-Kochman R, Paquet AC, Yang YJ, Madhusudhan MS, et al. (2007) Gene expression profiling of the human maternal-fetal interface reveals dramatic changes between midgestation and term. Endocrinology 148: 1059–1079.
  44. 44. Possenti R, al. E (2011) Characterization of a novel peripheral pro-lipolytic mechanism in mice: role of VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21. Biochem J. In Press.
  45. 45. Franken P, Malafosse A, Tafti M (1998) Genetic variation in EEG activity during sleep in inbred mice. Am J Physiol 275: R1127–1137.