Chromosome inheritance during sexual reproduction relies on deliberate induction of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) and repair of a subset of these breaks as interhomolog crossovers (COs). Here we provide a direct demonstration, based on our analysis of rad-50 mutants, that the meiotic program in Caenorhabditis elegans involves both acquisition and loss of a specialized mode of double-strand break repair (DSBR). In premeiotic germ cells, RAD-50 is not required to load strand-exchange protein RAD-51 at sites of spontaneous or ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs. A specialized meiotic DSBR mode is engaged at the onset of meiotic prophase, coincident with assembly of meiotic chromosome axis structures. This meiotic DSBR mode is characterized both by dependence on RAD-50 for rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at DSB sites and by competence for converting DSBs into interhomolog COs. At the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition, germ cells undergo an abrupt release from the meiotic DSBR mode, characterized by reversion to RAD-50-independent loading of RAD-51 and loss of competence to convert DSBs into interhomolog COs. This transition in DSBR mode is dependent on MAP kinase-triggered prophase progression and coincides temporally with a major remodeling of chromosome architecture. We propose that at least two developmentally programmed switches in DSBR mode, likely conferred by changes in chromosome architecture, operate in the C. elegans germ line to allow formation of meiotic crossovers without jeopardizing genomic integrity. Our data further suggest that meiotic cohesin component REC-8 may play a role in limiting the activity of SPO-11 in generating meiotic DSBs and that RAD-50 may function in counteracting this inhibition.
Faithful inheritance of chromosomes during sexual reproduction depends on the deliberate formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) and subsequent repair of a subset of these breaks by a mechanism that leads to crossovers between homologous chromosome pairs. The requirement for crossovers to ensure chromosome segregation poses a challenge for sexually reproducing organisms, as DSBs constitute a danger to genomic integrity in other contexts. This manuscript provides insight into the mechanisms that allow germ cells to generate recombination-based linkages that ensure chromosome inheritance while at the same time protecting the integrity of their genomes. Specifically, we provide a direct demonstration, based on our analysis of rad-50 mutants, that the meiotic program in C. elegans involves both acquisition and loss of a specialized meiotic mode of double-strand break repair (DSBR). We propose that the ability to revert to a less constrained DSBR environment at a late stage of meiotic prophase serves as a fail-safe mechanism for safeguarding the genome, as it provides an opportunity to repair any remaining DBSs and restore chromosome integrity prior to chromosome segregation.
Citation: Hayashi M, Chin GM, Villeneuve AM (2007) C. elegans Germ Cells Switch between Distinct Modes of Double-Strand Break Repair During Meiotic Prophase Progression. PLoS Genet 3(11): e191. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191
Editor: R. Scott Hawley, Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States of America
Received: July 30, 2007; Accepted: September 17, 2007; Published: November 2, 2007
Copyright: © 2007 Hayashi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by NIH grant R01GM67268 to AMV.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: CO, crossover; DAPI - 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DSB, double-strand break; DSBR, double-strand break repair; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IF, immunofluorescence; IR, ionizing radiation; SC, synaptonemal complex.
Faithful inheritance of chromosomes during meiosis relies on crossover (CO) recombination events between the DNA molecules of homologous chromosomes. Interhomolog COs underpin the formation of chiasmata that temporarily link homologs and allow them to orient and segregate toward opposite poles of the meiosis I spindle . This requirement for crossovers to ensure homolog segregation poses a challenge for sexually reproducing organisms, however, as meiotic recombination is initiated by formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) , lesions that constitute a danger to genomic integrity in other contexts. Thus, it is crucial that germ cells possess mechanisms not only for converting a subset of meiotic DSBs into interhomolog COs but also for limiting the number of DSBs formed and for repairing any excess DSBs prior to the meiotic cell divisions.
As interhomolog COs are rare during mitotic cell cycles, the need for specialized features that promote crossing over between homologs during meiosis has long been apparent. Consequently, research in a variety of experimental systems has yielded substantial knowledge regarding components of the machinery and mechanisms involved in promoting meiotic crossing over. However, relatively little attention has been focused on the importance of mechanisms that can constrain the activity of Spo11, the DSB-forming endonuclease . Likewise, the idea that germ cells might possess mechanisms to inactivate features of the meiotic recombination program that serve as impediments to DSB repair (DSBR) has not been widely articulated. Although we had previously proposed that distinct modes of DSBR might operate during different stages of meiotic prophase in C. elegans to ensure restoration of intact chromosomes [3,4], the prior evidence for this assertion was indirect and largely circumstantial.
In the current work, we now provide a direct demonstration that the meiotic program in C. elegans germ cells involves both acquisition and loss of a specialized mode of DSBR during meiotic prophase progression. This conclusion emerged during the course of analyzing DNA damage responses in mutants defective in rad-50, which encodes a component of the conserved Mre11/Rad50 complex that has been implicated in numerous aspects of both meiotic recombination programs and the DNA damage response in mitotically dividing cells [5–8]. The spatial organization of the C. elegans germ line was instrumental in this analysis. The fact that germ cells undergoing mitotic proliferation and germ cells entering and progressing through meiotic prophase are arranged in a temporal/spatial gradient along the distal-proximal axis of the gonad enabled simultaneous visualization of responses to DNA damage in germ cells at all stages of meiotic prophase. Further, this organization also enabled us to perform a “reverse time course” analysis in which we assessed outcomes for germ cells that were at progressively earlier stages of meiotic prophase at the time of exposure to an acute break-inducing treatment.
Our analysis shows that germ cells switch abruptly to a specialized meiotic mode of DSBR at the onset of meiotic prophase, visualized cytologically as acquisition of a requirement for RAD-50 to allow rapid accumulation of DNA strand exchange protein RAD-51 at DSB sites. Moreover, we show that germ cells undergo a second developmentally-programmed switch in DSBR mode as they pass through a MAP kinase-dependent transition from the mid-pachytene to late pachytene stage of meiotic prophase . This second switch is characterized by loss of RAD-50 dependence for RAD-51 loading and by loss of competence to convert DSBs into interhomolog COs. Each of these switches coincides temporally with a major remodeling of chromosome architecture [10–12], supporting the view that specialized aspects of the meiotic DSBR program are imposed or enforced by meiosis-specific differentiation of chromosome axis structures. Further, we also provide evidence suggesting that meiosis-specific cohesins may play an inhibitory role that limits the formation of meiotic DSBs. Together these features help to explain how germ cells are able to balance the imperative to generate recombination-based linkages that ensure chromosome inheritance with the imperative to preserve the integrity of their genomes.
C. elegans rad-50 Mutants Are Defective for Chiasma Formation During Meiosis
The rad-50 gene encodes the C. elegans ortholog of eukaryotic Rad50 and bacterial SbcC. Based on the structure of its orthologs, the N- and C-terminal domains of RAD-50 are predicted to comprise a bipartite ABC-type ATPase domain, with the intervening portion of the protein forming an extended intramolecular α-helical coiled-coil and a zinc-coordinating “hook” dimerization motif located at the end of the coiled-coil distant from the ATPase domain [13–15]; this structural organization is similar to that of the SMC components of the condensin and cohesin complexes . RAD-50 associates with conserved SbcD nuclease-domain protein MRE-11 , and complexes containing their orthologs have demonstrated endonuclease, exonuclease, DNA unwinding, and end-tethering activities in vitro [5–8]. The rad-50(ok197) allele contains a 1,517 bp deletion that removes the first 1,065 bp of coding sequence plus 124 bp immediately upstream of the predicted initiation codon. As this deletion eliminates the exons encoding the entire N-terminal portion of the ATPase domain (including the Walker A box) and about one-third of the N-terminal segment of the coiled-coil domain (which interacts with MRE-11), rad-50(ok197) is predicted to be a null allele.
Homozygous rad-50 mutant hermaphrodites from heterozygous (rad-50/+) mothers are viable but exhibit a set of phenotypes characteristic of mutants defective in meiotic recombination, similar to those previously reported for C. elegans mre-11 mutants . They produce 98.4% dead embryos (mainly reflecting aneuploidy resulting from autosomal missegregation) and a high incidence of XO males among the surviving progeny (the “Him” phenotype, reflecting X chromosome missegregation) (Table 1). Further, cytological examination of oocyte nuclei at diakinesis (the last stage of meiotic prophase) indicates that this chromosome segregation defect results from a lack of chiasmata connecting homologous chromosomes (Figure 1), presumably reflecting a failure to form interhomolog crossovers.
Progeny Viability and Percent Malesdoi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.t001
Figure 1. RAD-50 Is Required for Chiasma Formation but Not for Homolog Pairing and Synapsis
(A, B) Each panel shows the full karyotype in a single oocyte nucleus at diakinesis, the last stage of meiotic prophase. The wild-type nucleus (A) contains six DAPI-stained bodies, corresponding to the six pairs of homologous chromosomes (bivalents) attached by chiasmata, whereas the rad-50 mutant nucleus (B) contains 12 separate DAPI-stained chromosomes (univalents), indicating a lack of chismata connecting homolog pairs.
(C) Pachytene nuclei from the rad-50 mutant stained with antibodies detecting X-chromosome pairing center-binding protein HIM-8 and chromosome axis protein HIM-3. A single HIM-8 focus (or two closely spaced HIM-8 foci) is seen in each nucleus, indicating successful homologous pairing.
(D–F) Pachytene nuclei from the rad-50 mutant, showing coimmunolocalization of SC central region protein SYP-1 and meiotic chromosome axis protein HIM-3 at the interface between parallel tracks of DAPI-stained chromatin, indicating successful assembly of the SC. Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g001
DAPI staining, immunofluorescence, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments revealed apparently normal pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes in rad-50 mutant germ lines. As in wild-type meiosis , chromosome axis protein HIM-3 and synaptonemal complex (SC) central region protein SYP-1 colocalized at the interface between parallel-aligned DAPI tracks in pachytene nuclei of rad-50 mutants, indicating successful assembly of the SC (Figure 1). Further, we detected a single focus or two closely-spaced foci in pachytene nuclei both in FISH experiments assessing pairing at the 5S rDNA locus on chromosome V (Figure S1) and in experiments assessing pairing at the pairing center (PC) domain of the X chromosomes (by immunofluorescence of PC-binding protein HIM-8 [19,20]; Figure 1). The success of homologous pairing and synapsis indicates that the defect in chiasma formation in rad-50 mutants most likely results from a defect in the process of recombination per se.
Altered Patterns of Both SPO-11-Dependent Meiotic RAD-51 Foci and Spontaneous (SPO-11-Independent) RAD-51 Foci in rad-50 Mutant Germ Lines
Immunostaining for DNA strand exchange protein RAD-51 [3,21] revealed abnormalities in rad-50 mutant germ lines. First, rad-50 mutants exhibited severely reduced levels of SPO-11-dependent meiotic RAD-51 foci (Figure 2A and 2B). We quantified the number of foci stained with RAD-51 antibody in premeiotic germ cells and in germ cells entering and progressing through meiotic prophase. In wild-type control germ lines, levels of RAD-51 foci rose following entry into meiotic prophase and peaked in the early to mid-pachytene stage. Numbers of RAD-51 foci were greatly reduced in nuclei at the corresponding stages of meiotic prophase in rad-50 mutants, paralleling previous reports of reduced RAD-51 foci in mre-11 mutants . This reduction in meiotic prophase RAD-51 foci indicates either that meiotic DSB formation is reduced in rad-50 mutants or that RAD-50 is required to accumulate RAD-51 at meiotic DSBs.
Figure 2. Altered Profile of RAD-51 Foci in rad-50 Mutant Germ Lines
(A) Images show a portion of the germ lines of wild type and rad-50 mutant hermaphrodites, extending from the premeiotic region in which nuclei have not yet entered meiotic prophase (left) through the region of meiotic prophase entry (transition zone) and into the pachytene region (in which chromosomes are fully paired and synapsed; right). Chromosomes are stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. In the wild-type germ line, RAD-51 foci are very infrequent in premeiotic and transition zone nuclei, but are abundant in pachytene nuclei, with multiple foci in the majority of nuclei. In the rad-50 mutant germ line, the number of foci in premeiotic and transition zone nuclei is elevated, while the number of foci in pachytene nuclei is severely reduced. Scale bar = 5 μm.
(B) Quantitative time course analysis of RAD-51 foci. Stacked bar graph depicting quantitation of RAD-51 foci in premeiotic nuclei (pm), transition zone nuclei (tz), early-mid pachytene nuclei (e/m pt), and late pachytene nuclei (l pt) in gonads of the indicated genotypes. Different colored segments represent the percentage of nuclei scored that had the numbers of RAD-51 foci indicated by the color code at the right of the graph.
(C) High magnification view of pachytene nuclei from wild type and spo-11; rad-50 germ lines. Whereas the RAD-51 foci in the wild-type pachytene nuclei are more numerous, the SPO-11-independent RAD-51 foci in the spo-11; rad-50 nuclei are larger/brighter. Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g002
Second, rad-50 mutants exhibited elevated levels of SPO-11-independent RAD-51 foci (Figure 2B). Although levels of RAD-51 foci in meiotic prophase nuclei were severely reduced in the rad-50 mutant, residual levels of RAD-51 foci were higher than in spo-11 mutant germ lines (which lack meiotic DSBs [3,22]), and numbers of foci in premeiotic nuclei were elevated compared to either wild-type or spo-11 controls. spo-11; rad-50 double mutant germ lines exhibited RAD-51 focus profiles similar to those of the rad-50 single mutant, indicating that most (if not all) of the RAD-51 foci observed in rad-50 mutants were SPO-11-independent in origin (Figure 2B). Further, the SPO-11-independent foci observed both in the premeiotic and meiotic prophase regions of rad-50 and spo-11; rad-50 mutant germ lines appeared larger and brighter than either the SPO-11-dependent foci or premeiotic foci observed in controls (Figure 2C and unpublished data). These bright SPO-11-independent RAD-51 foci likely represent spontaneous DNA breaks and/or single-strand gaps that arose during the course of DNA replication; their presence suggests that RAD-50 is not required to load RAD-51 at lesions incurred in premeiotic nuclei. Further, the SPO-11-independent RAD-51 foci observed in meiotic prophase nuclei likely represent persistence of unrepaired breaks that occurred prior to meiotic prophase entry.
Consistent with the presence of unrepaired DSBs, the rad-50 mutant exhibited elevated levels of apoptosis in the late pachytene region of the germ line, where the pachytene DNA damage checkpoint operates to cull nuclei with persistent DNA damage . Using Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy to score apoptosis in adult (24–28 h post L4) germ lines , we observed an average of 4.5 apoptotic nuclei per gonad arm in rad-50(ok197) mutants (n = 24 gonad arms), compared with an average of 1.1 apoptotic nuclei per gonad arm in wild-type controls (n = 21 gonad arms) (p < 0.0001 for Mann-Whitney test).
Context-Dependent Requirement for RAD-50 for Rapid Accumulation of RAD-51 at Irradiation-Induced DSBs
Experiments aimed at assessing the response of rad-50 mutants to ionizing radiation (IR) unexpectedly revealed that C. elegans germ cells switch abruptly between RAD-50-independent and RAD-50-dependent modes of accumulation of RAD-51 at DNA break sites as they enter and progress through meiotic prophase. To focus on IR-induced breaks in the absence of endogenous meiotic breaks, we exposed spo-11 control and spo-11; rad-50 double mutant worms to 1,000 rad γ-irradiation and dissected and fixed their gonads 1 h post irradiation. Immunostaining revealed abundant RAD-51 foci in nuclei throughout the germ lines of irradiated spo-11 single mutant controls and irradiated wild-type worms (Figures 3 and S2), indicating that premeiotic germ cells and germ cells at all stages of meiotic prophase are capable of installing RAD-51 onto chromosomes, presumably at break sites. Similar to these controls, the germ lines of spo-11; rad-50 mutant worms also exhibited abundant IR-induced RAD-51 foci both in the premeiotic region and in the region containing nuclei from late pachytene through diakinesis stages of meiotic prophase (Figure 3). In contrast to controls, however, irradiated spo-11; rad-50 double mutant germ lines contained a region extending from the transition zone (where nuclei enter meiotic prophase) through mid-pachytene in which most nuclei were devoid of RAD-51 foci; within this region, germ lines appeared similar to the corresponding regions of unirradiated spo-11; rad-50 controls (i.e., with a subset of nuclei containing 1–2 bright spontaneous RAD-51 foci).
Figure 3. Context-Specific Requirement for Rapid Accumulation of RAD-51 at Sites of IR-Induced Breaks
Germ lines from spo-11(ok79) and spo-11(ok79); rad-50 hermaphrodites fixed 1 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. RAD-51 foci are detected in germ cell nuclei throughout the spo-11 gonad, from the proliferating nuclei at the distal tip (left) through nuclei at the diplotene stage of meiotic prophase (right). In the spo-11; rad-50 mutant, in contrast, RAD51 foci are absent in most nuclei in the central portion of the gonad, indicated by the bracket, from the onset of meiotic prophase through the mid-pachytene/late pachytene transition (see Figure 4). Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g003
Figure 4. RAD-50 Dependence for Loading of RAD-51 at IR-Induced Breaks Extends from Meiotic Prophase Onset to the Mid-Pachytene/Late Pachytene Transition
(A, B) Images show a portion of the germ lines of rad-50 mutant hermaphrodites fixed 1 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation, centered on the transition zone and extending from prior to the onset of meiotic prophase (premeiotic, left) through early pachytene (right). (A) HTP-3 staining is diffusely associated with chromatin in premeiotic nuclei, then becomes concentrated on chromosome axis structures at the beginning of the transition zone, first appearing as discontinuous stretches and then as extended continuous linear structures. IR-induced RAD-51 foci are abundant in nuclei with diffuse HTP-3 staining, whereas nuclei with concentrated meiotic HTP-3 signals have very few RAD-51 foci. Scale bar = 5 μm (B) SYP-1 immunostaining is either absent or detected as a single bright focus in premeiotic nuclei, and is extensively localized on chromosomes beginning in the transition zone. IR-induced RAD-51 foci are abundant in nuclei lacking SYP-1, whereas nuclei with abundant SYP-1 have very few RAD-51 foci. Scale bar = 5 μm.
(C) An unirradiated wild-type gonad and an irradiated rad-50 gonad stained with DAPI, α-RAD-51, and a monoclonal antibody detecting the activated, diphosphorylated form of MAP kinase (MAPK). Left, zoomed out view of the gonads (distal tip through diplotene), showing the position of the peak of MAP kinase activation that occurs at the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition. Right, zoomed in view of the region surrounding this peak of activated MAP kinase, showing the location of this peak relative to RAD-51 foci. In the unirradiated wild-type germ line, RAD-51 foci peak in mid-pachytene and diminish in numbers prior to the peak of activated MAPK. In the irradiated rad-50 germ line, background levels of bright SPO-11-independent spontaneous RAD-51 foci are seen in a subset of nuclei throughout the gonad, whereas IR-induced RAD-51 foci abruptly rise in abundance in late pachytene nuclei, after the peak of activated MAPK. Left; Scale bar = 20 μm. Right; Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g004
An identical “dark zone” lacking IR-induced RAD-51 foci was also seen in the germ lines of rad-50 and mre-11 single mutant worms exposed to 1 krad γ-irradiation (Figures 4 and S2); similar observations for the mre-11 mutant were also made in an independent study (A. Penkner and J. Loidl, personal communication.). Further, the contrast between the “dark zone” and regions with abundant IR-induced RAD-51 foci was even more pronounced following exposure of rad-50 mutants to a 5 krad dose (Figure S3). Interestingly, the region of the germ line where IR-induced foci were lacking in irradiated spo-11; rad-50 and rad-50 worms corresponds to the region where meiotic RAD-51 foci are most abundant in unirradiated wild-type germ lines (Figures 2A and 4; ).
We will operationally use the term “RAD-51 loading” to refer to the rapid formation of RAD-51 foci following break-inducing treatment. Although both association and dissociation of RAD-51 subunits will contribute to the immunofluorescence signals observed, evidence presented below supports the interpretation that slow/delayed formation of RAD-51 foci, rather than accelerated turnover of RAD-51-containing complexes, is responsible for the lack of IR-induced RAD-51 foci in germ cells within the “dark zone” of rad-50 mutant gonads.
Acquisition of the RAD-50-Dependent Mode of RAD-51 Loading Coincides with Meiotic Prophase Onset
Simultaneous immunolocalization of RAD-51 and meiotic chromosome structural proteins in the distal germ lines of IR-treated rad-50 worms demonstrated that a switch from RAD-50 independence to RAD-50 dependence for RAD-51 loading occurs at the onset of meiotic prophase. The earliest marker of meiotic prophase is concentration of HTP-3 protein onto nascent chromosome axis structures , first detected as discontinuous stretches and then as continuous bright lines. Whereas IR-induced RAD-51 foci were abundant in premeiotic nuclei (which exhibited diffuse HTP-3 staining on chromatin), there was an abrupt transition to a RAD-51-negative state in nuclei that had begun to acquire meiotic organization of HTP-3 structures (Figure 4A). Similar results were obtained in experiments imaging RAD-51 together with SYP-1, which assembles onto chromosomes following initial assembly of chromosome axes . IR-induced RAD-51 foci were abundant in premeiotic nuclei lacking SYP-1 immunofluorescence (IF) signals, but were lacking in nuclei in which SYP-1 was extensively associated with chromosomes (Figure 4B). Together these results indicate that entry into meiotic prophase is accompanied by imposition of a requirement for RAD-50 to allow rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at sites of DNA breaks.
Reversion to RAD-50 Independence for RAD-51 Loading at the Mid-Pachytene to Late Pachytene Transition
A second transition, in which nuclei revert to RAD-50-independence for loading of RAD-51, is observed as nuclei progress from mid-pachytene to late pachytene regions of the germ line (Figures 3 and 4C). Previous work showed that progression from mid to late pachytene requires a MAP kinase-dependent signaling event, visualized cytologically as a transient rise in the activated, diphosphorylated form of MAP kinase [9,25]. In wild-type germ lines, this peak in activated MAP kinase is found in a position just proximal to the zone in which SPO-11-dependent meiotic RAD-51 foci gradually decline in numbers, presumably reflecting progression of meiotic recombination (Figure 4C). The peak of activated MAP kinase was found in a similar position in the germ lines of irradiated rad-50 mutants (Figure 4C), indicating that activation of MAP kinase in this context does not require RAD-50. Moreover, the position of the peak is just distal to the abrupt transition to high levels of IR-induced RAD-51 foci. Further, the germ lines of irradiated mpk-1 (ga111ts); rad-50 double mutants, in which meiotic prophase progression was arrested at the mid-pachytene stage, did not exhibit a rise in levels of IR-induced RAD-51 foci in the corresponding region (Figure S4). Together these data indicate that reversion to a RAD-50-independent mode of RAD-51 loading requires MAP kinase-dependent developmental progression from the mid-pachytene to late pachytene stage. We will use the term “constrained region” to refer to the region of the germ line, extending from the onset of meiotic prophase to the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition, in which germ cells exhibit the requirement for RAD-50 to achieve rapid accumulation of RAD-51.
Time Course Analysis of IR-Induced RAD-51 Foci
Examination of spo-11; rad-50 germ lines that were fixed at additional time points (3, 6 and 12 h) after irradiation supports the interpretation that the dearth of IR-induced RAD-51 foci observed in the constrained region of spo-11; rad-50 germ lines (and rad-50 or mre-11 germ lines) is indicative of a prolonged delay in and/or severely reduced rate of accumulation of RAD-51 at break sites. At both the 3 h and 6 h post-irradiation time points, we continued to observe a robust RAD-51-dark zone in the central portion of spo-11; rad-50 mutant germ lines, indicating that IR-induced RAD-51 focus formation remained strongly inhibited in germ cells within this region (Figure 5). By 12 h post irradiation, however, a clear RAD-51-dark zone was no longer visible. At this 12 h time point, many transition zone nuclei and some early pachytene nuclei contained multiple bright RAD-51 signals (Figure S5); these bright signals reflect persistence of preassembled RAD-51 foci in nuclei that had been in the premeiotic region at the time of irradiation (; S. Mlynarczyk-Evans and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data). Further, we also observed some smaller/less intense RAD-51 foci in the majority of nuclei within the mid-pachytene region of these germ lines (Figures 5, S5, and S6B); this eventual rise in RAD-51 foci in the mid-pachytene region cannot be explained by movement and developmental progression of nuclei with pre-installed foci, as most nuclei within the mid-pachytene region at the 12 h time point had entered meiotic prophase prior to the time of irradiation (; S. Mlynarczyk-Evans and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data). These observations strongly suggest that installation of RAD-51 at DSB sites in nuclei within the constrained region of rad-50 mutant germ lines is severely delayed and/or occurs at a substantially reduced rate. Moreover, they argue against the alternative interpretation that failure to detect IR-induced RAD-51 foci in the constrained region is consequence of accelerated turnover of RAD-51-containing complexes.
Figure 5. Time Course Analysis of IR-Induced RAD-51 Foci in the Constrained Region of spo-11; rad-50 Germ Lines
Images show portions of spo-11; rad-50 germ lines, centered on the constrained region and also including a subset of premeiotic nuclei (left) and late pachytene nuclei (right). Germ lines were fixed at the indicated times following exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. An obvious RAD-51-dark region in the central segment of the germ line is readily discernable at the 1, 3 and 6 h time points, but not at the 12 h time point. Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g005
Loss of Competence to Convert IR-Induced DSBs into Interhomolog Crossovers Coincides Temporally with the Mid-Pachytene to Late Pachytene Transition
We previously showed that IR-induced DSBs can bypass the requirement for SPO-11 in initiating meiotic recombination, leading to formation of crossovers and functional chiasmata in spo-11 mutants [22,27]. In these prior experiments, the ability of IR-induced breaks to form chiasmata was assessed by examining diakinesis-stage oocytes 18 hrs following irradiation; based on a recent temporal analysis of meiotic prophase progression , we infer that the oocytes scored had been in the mid-pachytene stage at the time of irradiation.
To assess whether the transition from mid to late pachytene affects the ability to convert breaks into chiasmata, we performed a “reverse time course analysis” in which we assessed the efficacy for chiasma formation of breaks induced by IR at several time points spanning this transition, ranging from 18 to 12 h prior to fixation for scoring at late diakinesis (Table 2). Chiasmata were efficiently generated by IR delivered at the mid-pachytene time point (18 h); an average of 6.5 DAPI-stained bodies were detected, indicating that all six chromosome pairs were linked by chiasmata in most nuclei. In contrast, IR breaks introduced at the late pachytene time point (12 h) were almost completely ineffective at triggering chiasma formation; an average of 11.4 DAPI-stained bodies were detected, similar to the 11.5 average seen in the unirradiated control. Further, a bimodal distribution in the numbers of DAPI-stained bodies per nucleus was evident at all time points, suggesting that germ cells undergo an abrupt transition between chiasma-competent and chiasma-incompetent states at the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition.
Timing of γ-Irradiation Affects Efficacy of Chiasma Formation in spo-11 Mutant Germ Cellsdoi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.t002
RAD-50 Dependence for RAD-51 Loading Is Partially Abrogated in htp-1 and him-3 Mutants
As the onset of the requirement for RAD-50 to load RAD-51 at IR-induced breaks coincides with assembly of meiosis-specific chromosome structures, we tested whether loss of components of these structures might eliminate or mitigate this requirement. First, we found that loss of SC central region proteins does not alleviate this requirement. The overall RAD-51 IF pattern in both unirradiated and irradiated rad-50 syp-1 germ lines appeared very similar to rad-50 single mutant counterparts (Figure 6; unpublished data). The one notable difference was that the size of the zone of late pachytene nuclei exhibiting RAD-50-independent RAD-51 loading was reduced in the rad-50 syp-1 double mutant; the transition to the RAD-50-independent mode correlated with exit from the persistent state of chromosome clustering characteristic of syp-1 mutants .
Figure 6. RAD-50 Dependence for RAD-51 Loading Is Partially Abrogated in him-3 and htp-1 Mutants
Images show portions of germ lines extending from mid pachytene (left) through late pachytene/early diplotene (right) from hermaphrodites of the indicated genotypes that were exposed to 1 krad γ-irradiation 1 h prior to fixation. Both the rad-50 single mutant and the rad-50 syp-1 double mutant germ lines exhibit a “dark” region in which most nuclei lack RAD-51 foci, reflecting engagement of the RAD-50-dependent mode of RAD-51 loading that operates from meiotic prophase onset until the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition. In the rad-50 syp-1 double mutant, the transition to nuclei with abundant IR-induced RAD-51 foci is observed at a more proximal position than in the rad-50 single mutant, at the very end of the pachytene stage, following exit from the persistent clustered chromosome configuration that is characteristic of mutants lacking SC central region components. In the him-3; rad-50 and htp-1; rad-50 double mutant germ lines shown, IR-induced RAD-51 foci are detected in nuclei throughout the mid-pachytene region, indicating that the requirement for RAD-50 is partially alleviated; however these IR-induced foci are less intense than those seen in the comparable regions of either the wild-type or htp-1 single mutant control germ lines. Scale bar = 5 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g006
In contrast, we found that RAD-50 dependence within the constrained region was partially abrogated in both him-3; rad-50 and htp-1; rad-50 double mutants (Figures 6 and S3). HIM-3 and HTP-1 are two of four C. elegans paralogs of the meiosis-enriched HORMA domain protein family that also includes Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hop1 and Arabidpopsis Asy1 and Asy2 [4,10,28–31]. Both proteins localize to meiotic chromosome axes prior to SC assembly and persist in association with chromosome axes after SC disassembly, and both have been hypothesized to play roles in inhibiting use of the sister chromatid as a DSBR partner during meiotic prophase ([4,10,12,30]; E. Martinez-Perez, A. Dernburg and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data). In the absence of irradiation, RAD-51 IF patterns in him-3; rad-50 and htp-1; rad-50 germ lines appeared similar to that of the rad-50 single mutant (unpublished data). Following IR treatment, however, we observed RAD-51 IF patterns in htp-1; rad-50 and him-3; rad-50 mutant germ lines that were intermediate in appearance between those of irradiated htp-1 or him-3 single mutants and those observed in irradiated rad-50 single mutants. Whereas over 120 rad-50 single mutant gonads examined invariably exhibited a robust inhibition of IR-induced RAD-51 foci throughout the constrained region (extending from the zone of meiotic entry through the mid-to-late pachytene transition), IR-induced RAD-51 foci were frequently detected in nuclei within the constrained region in htp-1; rad-50 mutant germ lines. In 35% of htp-1; rad-50 gonads examined following a 1 krad IR treatment (n = 26; p < 0.0001) and in 97% of htp-1; rad-50 gonads examined following a 5 krad IR treatment (n = 32; p < 0.0001), we detected IR-induced RAD-51 foci in nuclei throughout most or all of the mid-pachytene region (Figures 6 and S3). In contrast to htp-1 single mutants, however, all htp-1; rad-50 gonads contained at least a small domain of transition zone and/or early pachytene nuclei in which IR-induced RAD-51 foci were strongly inhibited (Figure S3). Similarly, 36% of him-3; rad-50 gonads exposed to 1 krad IR treatment clearly exhibited IR-induced RAD-51 foci within the constrained region (n = 50; p < 0.0001). However, the altered pattern observed in him-3; rad-50 gonads differed from that seen in htp-1; rad-50 gonads in that when IR-induced RAD-51 foci were detected within the constrained region, they were present in nuclei throughout the entire region. In both cases, the IR-induced foci within the constrained region appeared smaller and/or less intense than those in either the premeiotic region or in late pachytene, suggesting that RAD-51 loading was slower and/or occurred over more limited stretches. The fact that RAD-50 dependence is only partially abrogated in him-3 or htp-1 mutant backgrounds may be a consequence of partial redundancy among the meiosis-enrich HORMA domain proteins, as all four C. elegans paralogs show similar localization to meiotic chromosomes ([4,10,19,30]; E. Martinez-Perez, A. Dernburg and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data).
Partial alleviation of the requirement for RAD-50 within the constrained region in these double mutants strongly suggests that proteins associated with meiosis-specific chromosome axis structure play a role in imposing this requirement. Further, the pattern of IR-induced foci observed in the htp-1; rad-50 double mutants suggests that germ cells lacking HTP-1 can at least partially engage the meiotic DSBR program at the onset of meiotic prophase but then undergo a premature release from the constraints that make rapid accumulation of RAD-51 dependent on RAD-50. Interestingly, this finding and interpretation parallels the previously proposed hypothesis that HTP-1 is required to prevent premature release from meiotic prophase constraints that inhibit use of sister chromatids as meiotic recombination partners .
RAD-50 and Meiotic DSB Formation
In light of our finding that RAD-50 is required within the constrained region for normal accumulation of RAD-51 at DSB sites, it was necessary to revisit the question of whether RAD-50 is also required for meiotic DSB formation. Collectively, the data reported in this section suggest that although RAD-50 likely plays a role in promoting normal levels of meiotic DSB formation, it is not strictly required for SPO-11 to be active in generating DSBs.
Several lines of evidence support the conclusion that SPO-11dependent DSB formation is reduced in rad-50 mutants. First, we did not observe a rise in abundance of RAD-51 foci in late pachytene or diplotene nuclei in unirradiated rad-50, rad-50 syp-1, him-3; rad-50 or htp-1; rad-50 germ lines (Figure 2; unpublished data); such a rise might have been expected following the transition to late pachytene if chromosomes had experienced SPO-11-generated breaks during earlier prophase. Second, analysis of rad-51; rad-50 double mutants also suggests that meiotic DSBs are reduced in number in rad-50 mutants. The rad-50 mutation suppresses the embryonic lethality of a rad-51 mutant  (Table 1): whereas rad-51 mutant hermaphrodites produced no viable embryos (n = 4,169), rad-51; rad-50 hermaphrodites produced 1% viable progeny (n = 3,055), similar to rad-50 single mutants. Most progeny lethality associated with the rad-50 mutation can be explained as a consequence of aneuploidy resulting from meiotic missegregation, whereas the complete lethality of the rad-51 progeny is thought to be a combined consequence of both missegregation and failed and/or defective repair of meiotic DSBs [21,32]; thus suppression of rad-51 progeny lethality by the rad-50 mutation suggests that meiotic DSBs are diminished in number by the rad-50 mutation. Similarly, the rad-50 mutation also suppresses cytological correlates of DSB formation visible in diakinesis-stage oocytes of rad-51 mutants (Figure 7). Aggregated, poorly condensed chromatin masses are frequently observed in diakinesis-stage oocytes in rad-51 mutant and in rad-51(RNAi) worms [21,33,34]; this pathology is apparently a consequence of defective repair of meiotic DSBs, as it is suppressed by a spo-11 mutation. The rad-51 aggregated chromatin phenotype is similarly suppressed by the rad-50 mutation, as distinct univalents are seen in rad-51; rad-50 diakinesis nuclei.
Figure 7. Abnormal Chromosome Morphology Associated with rad-51 Mutants Is Suppressed in rad-51; rad-50 Double Mutants
Each panel shows the full karyotype in a single diakinesis-stage oocyte. Diakinesis oocytes in the rad-51 mutant typically have abnormal-appearing, poorly condensed chromosomes (left) and/or aggregated masses of chromosomes (middle), whereas diakinesis oocytes in the rad-51; rad-50 double mutant exhibit well-formed, non-aggregated univalent chromosomes (right). Scale bar = 2 μm.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g007
Although suppression of the rad-51 defects by the rad-50 mutation is most simply explained by a reduction in meiotic DSBs, suppression is also consistent with the rad-50 mutation allowing use of alternative repair pathways and/or preventing entry of DSBs into a pathological dead-end pathway. This alternative explanation seems less likely to account for the above-mentioned lack of a late-prophase rise in RAD-51 foci in most unirradiated rad-50 single and double mutants, however, given that RAD-51 protein is present and can eventually be loaded at IR-induced DSBs incurred during early meiotic prophase (albeit with a substantial delay). Thus, taken together these observations suggest that SPO-11dependent DSB formation may be abrogated in rad-50 mutants.
Despite this evidence supporting a role for RAD-50 in promoting meiotic DSB formation, however, analysis of rec-8(ok978); rad-50 double mutant germ lines provided compelling evidence that SPO-11-dependent meiotic DSBs can nevertheless be formed in the absence of functional RAD-50. rec-8 encodes a meiosis-enriched α-kleisin subunit of cohesin [16,35], and the rec-8(ok978) mutation carries a deletion that is predicted to severely reduce or eliminate rec-8 function. Meiotic prophase nuclei in the germ lines of unirradiated rec-8(ok978) single mutant worms exhibited highly elevated levels of RAD-51 foci that persisted through late pachytene, diplotene and early diakinesis stages (Figure 8A), as seen previously for rec-8 RNAi and rec-8(cosuppression) worms .
Figure 8. DSB Formation and RAD-51 Loading in the rec-8 Mutant Background
(A) Images show portions of the germ lines extending from mid-late pachytene through diplotene from worms of the indicated genotypes (these worms were NOT exposed to IR). Persistent high levels of meiotic RAD-51 foci are observed throughout this region in the rec-8 single mutant [full genotype: rec-8(ok978) dpy-4(e1166)]. In the rec-8; rad-50 double mutant [full genotype: rec-8(ok978) dpy-4(e1166); rad-50(ok197)], a region in which most nuclei lack RAD-51 foci (left) is followed by a region in which most nuclei have multiple RAD-51 foci. The transition between these states in the unirradiated rec-8; rad-50 gonad occurs at the very end of the pachytene region. This late pachytene rise in RAD-51 foci is absent in the spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 triple mutant [full genotype: spo-11(me44) rec-8(ok978) dpy-4(e1166); rad-50(ok197)], implying that these late foci are SPO-11-dependent.
(B) Each panel shows the full karyotype in a single oocyte nucleus of the indicated genotype, either at the late diplotene/early diakinesis stage (left two panels, stained with DAPI [blue] and RAD-51 antibody [green]) or at late diakinesis (stained with DAPI in white; images shown are from the most mature oocyte in the gonad arm, in the −1 position immediately adjacent to the spermatheca). Multiple RAD-51 foci are detected in the late diplotene/early diakinesis nucleus from the rec-8; rad-50 worm, whereas the spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 nucleus at the same stage lacks RAD-51 foci. Similarly, multiple chromosome fragments are evident in the late diakinesis nucleus from the rec-8; rad-50 worm, whereas such fragments are not detected in the spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 late diakinesis nucleus (in which chromosomes are present largely as prematurely resolving pairs of sister chromatids). Scale bar = 2 μm.
(C) Elevated levels of premeiotic RAD-51 foci in rec-8 mutant germ lines. RAD-51 foci were quantified for nuclei within the first 15 rows of germ cells, beginning at the distal tip of the gonad; three different germ lines were scored for each genotype (185 total nuclei for wild type, 177 total nuclei for rec-8). Stacked bar graph depicts the percentages of nuclei scored that had the indicated numbers of RAD-51 foci; the difference between rec-8 and wild type germ lines is extremely significant (p < 0.0001).doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030191.g008
Several observations clearly indicate that SPO-11-dependent meiotic DSBs are formed in rec-8; rad-50 double mutant germ cells. First, whereas RAD-51 immunostaining in rec-8; rad-50 germ lines appeared similar to that in rad-50 and spo-11; rad-50 throughout most of meiotic prophase (i.e., with a subset of nuclei exhibiting one or a few bright foci and most nuclei lacking foci), there was a sharp rise in abundance of RAD-51 foci at late pachytene in rec-8; rad-50 germ lines, and foci persisted at high levels through diplotene and early diakinesis stages (Figure 8A and 8B). This late pachytene rise is SPO-11 dependent, as it does not occur in spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 triple mutants. Second, diakinesis nuclei in rec-8; rad-50 mutants exhibited severely fragmented chromosomes and highly abnormal chromosome morphology (Figure 8B). This fragmentation reflects the presence of SPO-11-dependent DSBs, as it is abolished in spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 triple mutants. Third, whereas rec-8; rad-50 mutant hermaphrodites do not produce any viable offspring, spo-11 rec-8; rad-50 hermaphrodites do produce significant numbers of viable offspring (Table 1). Together these findings demonstrate that formation of SPO-11-dependent DSBs does not strictly require RAD-50, at least in the context of the rec-8 mutant background.
These findings were corroborated by analysis of a rec-8; mre-11 double mutant, which also exhibited both a sharp rise in and persistence of RAD-51 foci in late prophase and fragmented chromosomes at diakinesis (unpublished data). Further, an independent study similarly found evidence that MRE-11 is dispensable for DSB formation in the context of compromised cohesin (Y. Mamnun, A. Baudrimont, V. Jantsch and J. Loidl, personal communication).
Evidence for a Premeiotic Function for REC-8
REC-8 protein is detected cytologically in nuclei throughout the distal premeiotic region of the germ line [35,36], although the significance of this premeiotic localization has not been understood. In the course of this analysis, we observed that in addition to exhibiting high levels of meiotic RAD-51 foci, rec-8 single mutants also exhibited significantly elevated levels of RAD-51 foci in premeiotic germ cells (Figure 8C). This elevation was observed within the distal-most 15 rows of germ cells, most of which are actively undergoing mitotic cell cycles [37,38]. This finding suggests that REC-8 may function in germ cells even prior to the transition to the meiotic mode of DNA replication .
Multiple Roles for RAD-50, before, during, and after Meiotic Recombination
Our analysis has identified roles for C. elegans RAD-50 in multiple events required for genome stability and chromosome inheritance, during germ cell proliferation, within the context of meiotic recombination, and following exit from the meiotic DSB repair mode in late prophase (see below). First, a requirement for RAD-50 is evident in the distal (premeiotic) region of the germ line, where germ cells are undergoing mitotic proliferation, as rad-50 mutants exhibit an elevated incidence of RAD-51 foci in this region. Further, these spo-11-independent RAD-51 foci are brighter than meiotic RAD-51 foci and persist as germ cells enter and progress through the meiotic program. These findings suggest that RAD-50 plays a role in repairing and/or preventing accumulation of DSBs and/or single-stranded DNA during mitotic proliferation, a role that may reflect the previously-demonstrated requirement for C. elegans MRE-11 to recruit DNA damage response proteins ATR, RPA and BARD1 (but not RAD-51) to sites of IR-induced DSBs in proliferating germ cells [39,40].
Second, RAD-50 appears to play several distinct roles in promoting the formation of interhomolog crossovers during the meiotic recombination program. During the “constrained” portion of meiotic prophase, RAD-50 is required for rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at sites of DSBs. This requirement likely reflects a role for the MRE-11/RAD-50 complex in promoting DSB resection in this context. Unresected meiotic DSBs accumulate in rad50s and mre11s (separation of function) mutants in S. cerevisiae [41,42], and because Spo11 is found covalently attached to the 5′ overhang at DSBs in these mutants , it has been proposed that the requirement for Mre11/Rad50 in DSB resection reflects a requirement for removing Spo11p from DNA ends. A role for Mre11/Rad50 in Spo11 removal was further demonstrated by the recent identification of covalently-linked Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes in wild-type meiosis that are both dependent on Mre11/Rad50 and structurally consistent with expectations for products of its demonstrated endonuclease activity ; however, these studies left open the question of whether Mre11/Rad50 might also be required to process recombination intermediates after Spo11 removal. Our demonstration that RAD-50 is required for rapid formation of RAD-51 foci at IR-induced breaks during the period when the meiotic mode of DSBR is engaged strongly supports a role for RAD-50 in DSBR during meiosis beyond removal of SPO-11 from DSB ends, likely in promoting continued end resection.
Further, whereas our analysis of rec-8; rad-50 mutants clearly demonstrates that RAD-50 is not strictly required for SPO-11-dependent meiotic DSB-forming activity, multiple other data suggest that RAD-50 likely does normally play a role in promoting meiotic DSB formation. Rescue of rad-51-associated diakinesis chromosome morphology and progeny lethality in rad-51; rad-50 double mutants as well as the absence of a late prophase rise in RAD-51 foci and the intact appearance of diakinesis univalents in unirradiated him-3; rad-50 and rad-50 syp-1 double mutants are most readily explained as reflections of a substantial reduction in DSB formation in the absence of RAD-50, and consequently as evidence that RAD-50 does play a role in promoting meiotic DSB formation in C. elegans. A requirement for Mre11/Rad50 at the DSB step is clearly not a universal feature of the meiotic program, however. Although such a requirement is well-documented in S. cerevisiae , no such requirement exists in S. pombe (where persistent meiotic DSBs in rad50Δ mutants are detected by gel assays ), in Arabidopsis (where loss of Mre11 results in Spo11-dependent chromosome fragmentation ), or in Drosophila (where persistent γHis2Av foci are detected in a rad50 mutant ) . Moreover, even in S. cerevisiae, Mre11 and Rad50 are present in a protein complex that is distinct from the complexes that contain Spo11 or several non-conserved proteins required for DSB formation [48–50]. Consequently, the reason for the requirement for Mre11/Rad50 in DSB induction has remained largely mysterious.
Our finding that an apparent requirement for C. elegans RAD-50 in meiotic DSB formation is mitigated in a rec-8 mutant background provides new framework for thinking about this issue. Our observations can be reconciled in the context of a model proposing that REC-8 and RAD-50 promote counterbalancing influences on chromosome structure that create an environment in which regulated DSB formation can occur. Very high levels of RAD-51 foci are observed in the rec-8 mutant immediately after entry into meiotic prophase (; unpublished data), raising the possibility that in addition to promoting normal/timely repair of meiotic DSBs, REC-8 may also play an inhibitory role that limits the activity of SPO-11 in DSB formation. In one version of this model, RAD-50 would play a role in counteracting the inhibitory effects of REC-8, perhaps through local action at DSB sites; in the absence of the REC-8 inhibitory effect, the requirement for RAD-50 would be (at least partially) alleviated. An implicit assumption of this scenario is that the SPO-11-dependent DSBs detected as RAD-51 foci and chromosome fragments in late prophase in rec-8; rad-50 germ lines were formed during early prophase (but were not detected because the meiotic requirement for RAD-50 to load RAD-51 is still functional in the rec-8 mutant background [unpublished data]). An alternative possibility is that the late foci and breaks in the rec-8; rad-50 mutant might instead reflect abnormally late activity of SPO-11 in the double mutant. This alternative scenario would also imply a role for REC-8 in inhibiting SPO-11-dependent DSB formation, in this case in preventing DSB formation from occurring during late prophase, within a context in which RAD-50 is no longer required to promote SPO-11 activity. In light of the former model, we are intrigued by the possibility that the requirement for Mre11/Rad50 for meiotic DSB formation in budding yeast might similarly reflect a role in counteracting an inhibitory effect of Rec8. Although this possibility has not been investigated, it is interesting to note that chromatin IP experiments have revealed a negative correlation between cohesin binding sites and meiotic DSB sites [51,52].
Our data provide evidence for one additional role for RAD-50 in C. elegans germ cells as they complete prophase and restructure their chromosomes in preparation for the meiotic divisions. Specifically, the fragmented late diakinesis chromosomes and complete progeny lethality observed in rec-8; rad-50 double mutants indicate that RAD-50 is also required to restore chromosome integrity even after germ cells have undergone a switch to a “post-meiotic” DNA repair mode at the mid-pachytene to late pachytene transition, at least in the context of high levels of breaks and/or altered relationships between sister chromatids.
Imposition of and Release from a Specialized Meiotic Mode of DSBR Coupled to Changes in Chromosome Architecture
It has long been appreciated that the dependence of meiotic chromosome segregation on interhomolog crossovers requires both (1) an ability to generate meiotic DSBs to serve as initiating events and (2) acquisition of a specialized mode of DSBR that promotes conversion of a subset of DSBs into interhomolog crossovers. Meiotic specializations include mechanisms for inhibiting sister-directed repair as well as recruitment of meiosis-specific recombination proteins that promote the crossover outcome. We had previously proposed that meiotic cells might also possess an “exit strategy” involving a late prophase release from the constraints imposed by the meiotic mode of DSBR and reversion to a default DSBR mode as a means to ensure restoration of intact chromosomes prior to the meiotic divisions [3,4]. A similar idea was suggested by Mahadevaiah et al.  to explain the disappearance of DSB-associated markers in chromosome regions undergoing heterosynapsis in mouse spermatocytes. Until recently, however, the evidence for such a late prophase switch in DSBR mode was largely circumstantial and indirect. The analysis of IR-induced RAD-51 focus formation in rad-50 mutants reported here has provided a means to visualize directly a programmed shift in the requirements for DSBR that is imposed upon meiotic prophase entry and released in late prophase. Specifically, we have demonstrated that a requirement for RAD-50/MRE-11 to achieve rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at DSBs is acquired at the onset of meiotic prophase in C. elegans and is lost following progression of germ cells through a MAP kinase-dependent transition from the mid-pachytene to late pachytene stage.
Our data suggest that the “meiotic DSBR mode” (characterized by RAD-50 dependence for RAD-51 loading) is imposed, at least in part, by meiosis-specific differentiation of chromosome axis structures. The switch to RAD-50 dependent RAD-51 loading is engaged at the onset of prophase and coincides temporally with assembly of meiotic chromosome axes. Further, this dependence is partially alleviated in mutants lacking either HIM-3 or HTP-1, which are major components of meiotic chromosome axes (; E. Martinez-Perez, A. Dernburg and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data). The fact that RAD-50 dependence is partially abrogated in htp-1 and him-3 mutants argues against a trivial explanation for RAD-50 dependence, i.e., absence of expression of a compensating nuclease during the window of RAD-50 dependence. In contrast, SC central region assembly is not required to confer RAD-50 dependence, as the requirement persists in syp-1 mutants. Interestingly, both him-3 and htp-1 mutants have been proposed to be defective in inhibiting use of sister chromatids as DSBR partners (based on approximately normal kinetics of disappearance of RAD-51 foci despite lack of association between homologous partner chromosomes, suggesting the occurrence of sister chromatid-directed DSBR), whereas the barrier to sister-directed repair appears to be largely intact in syp-1 and syp-2 mutants (based on prolonged persistence of meiotic RAD-51 foci). It is striking that both (1) dependence of RAD-51 removal on association between homologs and (2) dependence of RAD-51 loading on RAD-50 are either retained or relieved in parallel under different mutant conditions, suggesting that these features are coordinately implemented as part of an integrated meiotic DSBR program. This in turn suggests that RAD-50 dependence of IR-induced RAD-51 focus formation can serve as a convenient surrogate for engagement of multiple aspects of the meiotic mode of DSBR.
How might HTP-1 and HIM-3 function to inhibit RAD-51 loading in the absence of RAD-50? One possibility is that these chromosome axis-associated proteins might generate a structural barrier that prevents alternative nuclease complexes from gaining access to DSBs generated within the constrained region. This type of mechanism would imply that DSBs may become associated with chromosome axis structures even if they are initially formed at distant positions within chromatin loops, as suggested previously by Blat et al. . An alternative possibility is that the prolonged delay in RAD-51 accumulation at IR-induced breaks in rad-50 mutants represents a checkpoint response, and that HIM-3 and HTP-1 play a role in the operation of this checkpoint. This model is appealing for several reasons. First, HTP-1 was previously proposed to function in checkpoint-like mechanisms that coordinate homolog recognition with SC assembly, in a manner analogous to the spindle assembly checkpoint . Second, these proteins share an unusual conserved structural motif, the HORMA domain, with Mad2, a central player in the spindle assembly checkpoint . Under this model, a DSB formed within the constrained region would generate a “wait resection” signal that inhibits progression of repair until a meiosis-specific recombination complex can be assembled; in a rad-50 mutant, the conditions required to satisfy the checkpoint are not met, resulting in the observed delay in RAD-51 loading.
Our finding that germ cells revert to RAD-50 independence for RAD-51 loading in late prophase demonstrates the existence of a second developmentally programmed switch in the mode of DSBR. This switch occurs following a transient activation of MAP kinase that is required for progression from the mid-pachytene to late pachytene stage of meiotic prophase and is dependent on MAP kinase. Further, we showed that the switch occurs within the same time frame as loss of the capacity to convert IR-induced DSBs into interhomolog crossovers, suggesting that multiple aspects of the meiotic mode of DSBR are shut down simultaneously. We suggest that MAP kinase activation at the mid-late pachytene transition triggers a coordinate release from multiple constraints operating during earlier stages of meiotic prophase that together promote DSBR through formation of interhomolog crossovers.
This mid-late pachytene switch in DSBR mode occurs contemporaneously with a major remodeling of meiotic chromosome architecture. Whereas SC central region proteins (e.g., SYP-1) and meiotic chromosome axis proteins colocalize uniformly along the full lengths of synapsed homologs from early-mid pachytene, components of these structures undergo a dramatic relocalization beginning in late pachytene. Even prior to desynapsis, SYP-1 becomes concentrated to a localized domain on each homolog pair (in the vicinity of and distal to the single emerging chiasma), while a subset of chromosome axis components (including HTP-1) become concentrated to the reciprocal chromosomal domains (; E. Martinez-Perez and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data).
In a recent analysis of synapsis-defective mutants , Smolikov et al. noted a correlation between chromosome organization within meiotic prophase nuclei (i.e., chromosomes clustered toward one side of the nucleus versus chromosomes dispersed about the nuclear periphery) and ability to remove SPO-11-dependent RAD-51 foci as an indicator of progression of DSBR. Based on their findings, they suggested a model in which chromosome clustering would inhibit some modes of DSBR, while chromosome dispersal might create an environment more permissive for multiple modes of DSBR. In the current analysis, we found that reversion to the RAD-50 independent mode of RAD-51 loading in rad-50 syp-1 double mutants did not occur until chromosomes finally dispersed at the very end of the pachytene region, in keeping with the idea that persistent chromosome clustering may inhibit use of alternative modes of DSBR. However, our analysis also demonstrated that chromosome dispersal per se is not sufficient to confer a fully permissive DSBR environment.
Our work provides insight into the mechanisms that allow germ cells to generate recombination-based linkages that promote segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis while at the same time safeguarding the integrity of the genome. We show that C. elegans germ cells engage a specialized mode of DSBR at the onset of meiotic prophase, characterized by dependence on RAD-50 for rapid accumulation of RAD-51 at DSBs and by competence to convert DNA breaks into interhomolog crossovers. This requirement for RAD-50 is imposed, at least in part, by meiosis-specific differentiation of chromosome axis structures. Our data further suggest a model in which features of chromosome structure conferred by the meiotic cohesin component REC-8 may limit the activity of SPO-11 in generating meiotic DSBs. Finally, we show that germ cells undergo a second developmentally programmed switch in DSBR mode at the mid-late pachytene transition, characterized by reversion to a RAD-50 independent mode of RAD-51 loading and loss of competence to generate interhomolog crossovers.
Observations from several different experimental systems suggest that a capacity to switch from a highly specialized meiotic DSBR mode to a less constrained DSBR mode during prophase progression may be a widespread feature of meiotic programs. For example, Mehrotra and McKim  recently reported that formation of γ-His2Av foci in response to X-ray-induced DSBs occurs much more slowly in the early pachytene stage than in the late pachytene stage during Drosophila female meiosis, even in repair-proficient germ cells. The authors propose that this may reflect repression of the normal DSB response during early meiotic prophase, followed by alleviation of this repression at the transition to the late pachytene stage. Further, during mouse spermatocyte meiosis, disappearance of DSB-associated markers from heterosynapsed chromosome regions occurs in a later time window than disappearance of markers from correctly synapsed chromosomes , likewise suggesting a change in the rules governing DSB repair during prophase progression. We suggest that a late prophase switch to a less constrained DSBR environment serves as fail-safe mechanism for safeguarding the genome by providing an opportunity to restore chromosome integrity prior to chromosome segregation.
Materials and Methods
Except where specified, all C. elegans strains were cultured at 20 °C under standard conditions . The following mutations and chromosome rearrangements were used: Chromosome III: unc-79(e1068), mpk-1(ga111ts); Chromosome IV: dpy-13(e184) , htp-1 (gk174), him-3(gk149), spo-11(ok79, me44), rad-51(lg8701), rec-8(ok978), dpy-4(e1166); Chromosome V: mre-11(ok179), rad-50 (ok197), syp-1(me17) Balancers: nT1 IV;V. nT1[ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; nT1 V. nT1 IV; nT1[qIs51] V
The following balanced heterozygous stocks were generated for this analysis:
AV158 +/ nT1 [unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 V
AV270 spo-11(ok79)/ nT1[ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 V
AV457 +/ nT1 IV; rad-50 (ok197) syp-1(me17)/ nT1 [qIs51]V
AV451 him-3(gk149)/nT1[ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [qIs51] V
AV443 htp-1 (gk174)/nT1[ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [qIs51] V
AV414 dpy-13(e184) rad-51(lg8701)/nT1[ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 V
AV417 rad-51(lg8701)/nT1[unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 V
AV423 rec-8(ok978)/nT1[unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [qIs51] V
AV468 rec-8(ok978) dpy-4(e1166)/nT1 IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [qIs51] V
AV469 spo-11(me44) rec-8(ok978) dpy-4(e1166)/nT1 IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [qIs51]V
AV462 unc-79(e1068) mpk-1(ga111ts) III; +/ nT1 [unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV; rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 V
For all experiments with meiotic mutants, homozygous mutant worms were derived from balanced heterozygous parents either by selecting progeny worms lacking a dominant marker (Unc and/ or GFP) associated with the balancer chromosome or by selecting worms homozygous for a cis-linked recessive marker.
To evaluate acquisition of IR-induced RAD-51 foci in unc-79 mpk-1(ga111ts); rad-50 hermaphrodites at non-permissive temperature, we shifted unc-79 mpk-1(ga111ts); rad-50 (ok197)/ nT1 [ unc-?(n754) let-? qIs50] IV;V gravid adults from 15 °C to 26 °C, allowed them to produce self-progeny, and selected non-GFP progeny at the L4 stage. At 20 h post L4, worms were exposed to IR and subsequently processed for IF as described below.
The rad-50(ok197) deletion was isolated from unbalanced heterozygotes obtained from the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium. Sequencing of the deletion fragment amplified by PCR from rad-50(ok197) homozygotes revealed a deletion of 1,571 bp, from coordinates 12246298 to 12247814 on chromosome V. The sequences flanking the deletion are: gaatttcactttacttagtc, tgaaattatttagcactgcc.
The spo-11(me44) allele contains a G to A transition at coordinate 11125782 of chromosome IV, the last coding base of exon 6. Although this represents a change in the splice donor sequence, this change is not predicted to interfere with splicing and is instead predicted to act as a missense mutation, changing a highly conserved Glycine to an Aspartic acid at residue 290 of the 425 amino acid protein. The affected residue is in the middle of the TOPRIM_TopoIIB_SPO cd00223 motif (at the junction between the TOPRIM domain and the dimer interface) and is conserved as a Glycine in all SPO11 proteins for which functional data are available  as well as in 92% of 51 aligned sequences defining the motif in CDD. Previous functional characterization indicates that spo-11(me44) behaves as a severe loss-of-function or null allele in meiotic recombination assays .
rec-8(ok978) is an insertion/deletion allele in which 1,577 bp of the rec-8 gene are deleted and replaced by an insertion of 371 bp. Depending on the outcome of RNA processing, the altered gene may have the capacity to encode for a truncated product comprising less than half of the 781 amino acids present in the wild-type protein. Comparison with previously-reported rec-8(RNAi) and rec-8(cosuppression) phenotypes [3,21,35] suggests that rec-8(ok978) severely reduces or eliminates gene function.
Except where noted below, fixation, DAPI-staining, immunostaining and acquisition and processing of images using the Deltavision deconvolution microscopy system was carried out as in , using gonads dissected from 18–20 h post-L4 adults. The following primary antibodies were used at the indicated dilutions: guinea pig α-SYP-1 (1:200) , rabbit α-RAD-51 (1:50) , rabbit α-HIM-3 (1:200) , chicken α-HTP-3 (1:500) , guinea pig α-HIM-8 (1:500) . Secondary antibodies used were: Alexa 488 α-rabbit, Alexa 555 α-guinea pig, Alexa 555 α-chicken. For most double-labeling experiments, primary antibody incubations were performed simultaneously, followed by simultaneous incubation with secondary antibodies. For SYP-1 and RAD-51 double staining, slides were incubated sequentially with α-RAD-51 primary, α-rabbit secondary, α-SYP-1 primary, α-guinea pig secondary. Images were collected in z-series representing a longitudinal bisection of each gonad arm; images shown are projections through data stacks encompassing whole nuclei.
For most experiments assessing formation of RAD-51 foci following IR treatment, 20 h post-L4 worms were exposed to 1 krad of γ-irradiation from a 137Cs source; gonads were dissected and fixed for IF at 1 h post irradiation. The 1 krad dose used in these experiments is 5–7-fold lower than the doses typically used in most prior analyses of DSBR in C. elegans germ cells (e.g., [4,18,39,40]). This dose was used because it was sufficient to elicit abundant RAD-51 foci in both wild-type and spo-11 mutant germ lines and to restore chiasma formation in a spo-11 mutant , but does not lead to the poorly condensed, aggregated and/or fragmented appearance of chromosomes observed in diakinesis-stage oocytes in mre-11 or rad-50 mutants following a 5 krad exposure ( and unpublished data). For Figure S3, a 5 krad dose was used; for Figures 5, S5, and S6, germ lines were fixed at the indicated times following irradiation at the 1 krad dose.
For Figure 2B and 2C, gonads were dissected from 21 h post-L4 adults; slides were transferred to 100% methanol at −20 °C for 30–60 s, then post-fixed with 4% formaldehyde in 1× PBS, 80 mM HEPES, pH 6.9, 1.6 mM MgSO4 for 30 min. Slides were washed in PBST and held at 4 °C until post-fixing was complete for all slides. Slides were blocked with 0.5% BSA for 1 h, then incubated with RAD-51 antibody (1:100 dilution in 50 μL PBST for 2 h at room temperature, then overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed 3× in PBST for 15 min; Cy3-labelled secondary antibody (Jackson Laboratories) was applied at a dilution of 1:200 in PBST and slides were incubated as for primary antibody. Slides were washed 3× in PBST for 15 min then stained with DAPI, mounted, and imaged, as in . Quantitation of RAD-51 foci in zones distributed along the distal-proximal gonad axis was performed as in . Correspondence of stages indicated on Figure 2B to the zones used in Colaiacovo et al. are as follows: “premeiotic (pm)”, zones 1 and 2; “transition zone (tz)”, zone 3; “early-mid pachytene (e/m pt)”, zones 4 and 5; “late pachytene (l pt)”, zone 6 (Note that zone 6 in  corresponds to zone 7 in several subsequent studies, e.g., ). Numbers of nuclei scored were as follows: Wild-type: pm, 424; tz, 191; e/m pt, 285; l pt, 91. rad-50: pm, 248; tz, 78; e/m pt, 134; l pt, 54. spo-11: pm, 565; tz,168; e/m pt, 416; l pt,118. spo-1; rad-50: pm, 292; tz, 149; e/m pt, 261; l pt, 89.
For Figure 4C, double labeling with α-RAD-51 and mouse monoclonal antibody M8159 (Anti-MAP Kinase, Activated [Diphosphorylated ERK-1&2] [Sigma], used at 1:1,000 dilution) was performed following the method of , with modifications (Y Sasagawa, personal communication). Gonads dissected from 20 h post-L4 worms were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature, then post-fixed for 10 min with dimethylformamide at −20 °C. Slides were washed with 1× PBST three times for 10 min and blocked with 3% BSA, 2mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20 for 20 min. Slides were incubated with primary antibodies in 1× PBS, 0.1%BSA, 0.5%Triton X-100, 0.05% sodium azide,1mM EDTA overnight in a humid chamber at 4 °C. Slides were washed as above and incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa 488 α-rabbit and Alexa 555 α-mouse) for 2 h at 25 °C.
Quantitation of achiasmate chromosomes in ooctye nuclei.
For quantitation of achiasmate chromosomes in the rad-50(ok197) mutant, whole worms were fixed with Carnoy's fixative at 48 h post L4 and stained with DAPI as in . For experiments assessing chiasma formation in spo-11(ok79) worms following exposure to ionizing radiation, whole worms were fixed in ethanol and stained with DAPI as in . Twenty h post-L4 adult worms were exposed to 1 krad of γ-irradiation from a 137Cs source, and cohorts were fixed 12, 14, 16, or 18 h later; unirradiated controls were fixed at the 18-h time point (38 h post-L4). Since individual univalents or bivalents in some oocyte nuclei lie too close to each other to be resolved unambiguously, these assays tend to underestimate the frequency of achiasmate chromosomes. Although the dose used in these experiments was 5-fold lower than that used in previous reports (5 krad), sufficient breaks were generated to restore chiasma formation for the full complement of chromosomes at high frequency.
Figure S1. Successful Pairing of Chromosome V in the rad-50 Mutant
Pachytene nuclei from a rad-50 mutant germ line hybridized with a FISH probe (orange) targeting the 5S locus on chromosome V. A single hybridization signal or a pair of closely-spaced signals is present in each nucleus, indicative of intimate pairing of homologous chromosomes. Scale bar = 2 μm.
(1.5 MB TIF)
Figure S2. Both rad-50 and mre-11 Mutants Are Defective in Rapid Accumulation of RAD-51 at IR-Induced Breaks from Meiotic Prophase Onset through the Mid-Pachytene Stage
Germ lines from wild type (WT), rad-50, and mre-11 hermaphrodites fixed 1 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. RAD-51 foci are detected in germ cell nuclei throughout the wild-type gonad, from the proliferating nuclei at the distal tip (left) through nuclei at the diplotene stage of meiotic prophase (right). In the rad-50 and mre-11 mutants, in contrast, RAD51 foci are absent in most nuclei in the central portion of the gonad, indicated by the bracket, from the onset of meiotic prophase through the mid-pachytene/late pachytene transition (see Figure 4). Scale bar = 5μm.
(9.6 MB TIF)
Figure S3. Response of Germ Cells to 5 krad Dose of γ-Irradiation
Germ lines from rad-50 and htp-1; rad-50 hermaphrodites fixed 1 h after exposure to 5 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. As in experiments using 1 krad IR treatment, strong inhibition of IR-induced RAD-51 foci is observed in the central portion of the rad-50 mutant germ line (indicated by bracket); moreover, because RAD-51 foci in premeiotic and late prophase germ cells are more abundant following this higher dose, the contrast between these regions and the inhibited zone is even more pronounced than at the lower dose. Abundant RAD-51 foci are present throughout most of the central portion of the htp-1; rad-50 germ line, indicating that inhibition of IR-induced RAD-51 foci is abrogated in this double mutant. The htp-1; rad-50 germ line does retain a reduced domain (indicated by bracket) in which most nuclei lack RAD-51 foci, indicating that inhibition of IR-induced RAD-51 focus formation is not completely eliminated. Scale bar = 5 μm.
(5.8 MB TIF)
Figure S4. Reversion to the RAD-50-Dependent Mode of RAD-51 Loading Requires MPK-1 (MAP kinase)
Germ lines from mpk-1(ga111ts) (control) and mpk-1(ga111ts); rad-50 hermaphrodites raised at 26 °C, fixed 1 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. Abundant IR-induced RAD-51 foci are seen in the premeiotic region of the mpk-1; rad-50 germ line, followed by a “dark” region indicative of switching to the RAD-50-dependent mode of RAD-51 loading at the onset of meiotic prophase. However, meiotic prophase does not progress beyond the pachytene stage, and there is no second zone with abundant IR-induced RAD-51 foci. Failure to detect reversion to the RAD-50-independent mode of RAD-51 loading does not imply a direct regulation of RAD-51 by MAP kinase, but rather indicates that developmental progression to the late pachytene stage (which is dependent on MAP kinase) is required for the switch in DSBR mode. Scale bar = 20 μm.
(2.4 MB TIF)
Figure S5. Persistence of Preassembled RAD-51 Foci Following Entry into Meiotic Prophase
Distal portion of a germ line from a spo-11; rad-50 mutant worm, extending from the distal tip to mid-pachytene region, fixed 12 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with HTP-3 and RAD-51 antibodies. The arrows indicate the region containing nuclei with concentrated HTP-3 signals indicative of meiotic prophase chromosome structures. In contrast to the 1 h time point, where abundant bright RAD-51 foci and meiotic HTP-3 signals are mutually exclusive (Figure 4), abundant bright RAD-51 foci are present in transition zone and early pachytene nuclei (which contain extensive meiotic HTP-3 signals) at this 12 h time point. Based on recent temporal analyses of progression through meiotic prophase (; S. Mlynarczyk-Evans and A. Villeneuve, unpublished data), we infer that these nuclei in early meiotic prophase at the 12 h time point had been in the premeiotic region at the time of irradiation. In more proximal positions (right), many meiotic prophase nuclei exhibit smaller, more discrete RAD-51 foci, apparently reflecting delayed accumulation of RAD-51 at break sites; nuclei in this region were already in the constrained region at the time of irradiation. Scale bar = 5 μm.
(6.6 MB TIF)
Figure S6. Comparisons of RAD-51 Foci at 1 h and 12 h Post-Irradiation Time Points
Images shown are portions of spo-11 and spo-11; rad-50 germ lines from (A) the premeiotic region, (B) the mid-pachytene region, and (C) the late pachytene/diplotene/early diakinesis region, fixed at 1 or 12 h after exposure to 1 krad γ-irradiation and stained with DAPI and RAD-51 antibody. In contrast to all other pairs of panels, which show a reduction in the number of foci per nucleus and/or the fraction of nuclei with foci between the 1 and 12 h time points, there was a clear increase in the incidence of foci in the mid-pachytene region of the spo-11; rad-50 mutant (B). As nuclei in the mid-pachytene region at the 12 h time point were already in meiotic prophase at the time of irradiation, this rise in the incidence of foci reflects delayed accumulation of RAD-51, presumably at break sites. Whereas a detailed analysis of the kinetics of disappearance of RAD-51 foci will be presented elsewhere, we highlight here several additional point illustrated by this figure: (A) Whereas abundant RAD-51 foci are detected in nuclei in the premeiotic region (for both spo-11 and spo-11; rad-50) at the 1 h time point, at the 12 h time point the premeiotic region contains two distinct classes of nuclei—one with bright RAD-51 signals and one lacking RAD-51 foci. These two classes are already evident at 5 h post irradiation (unpublished data). We suggest that these two classes may reflect distinct responses in nuclei that were in different phases of the cell cycle at the time of irradiation; we hypothesize that although germ cell nuclei in all phases of the mitotic cycle are competent to load RAD-51, only a subset of nuclei are competent to complete repair (and presumably to resume cycling). Further, the persistent RAD-51 foci suggest the formation of unproductive RAD-51-containing complexes in the other class of nuclei. The two classes of nuclei are found in the premeiotic regions of both spo-11 and spo-11; rad-50 germ lines (see also Figure 5), suggesting that some RAD-50-independent repair may occur in proliferating germ cells. Persistent RAD-51 foci do not represent a barrier to meiotic prophase entry, as nuclei with persistent bright foci are observed in the transition zone and early pachytene regions of both spo-11 and spo-11; rad-50 germ lines at the 12 h time point (Figure S5; unpublished data), reflecting movement and developmental progression of nuclei that were in the premeiotic region at the time of irradiation. (B) RAD-51 foci in the mid-pachytene region decline in abundance between the 1 and 12 h time points in the spo-11 mutant, but most nuclei retain at least one or a few RAD-51 foci at the 12 h time point; this suggests that within the constrained region, repair is ongoing but is not yet complete by 12 h after irradiation. (C) Nuclei in the diplotene and diakinesis stages at the 12 h time point are inferred to correspond to nuclei that were in the late pachytene region at the time of irradiation, and nuclei in the late pachytene region at the 12 h time point are inferred to correspond to nuclei that were in the mid-pachytene region at the time of irradiation. In the 12 h spo-11 germ line, foci are reduced in abundance in late pachytene and diplotene nuclei and are absent by early diakinesis, suggesting that repair may be completed by the time nuclei reach the diakinesis stage. In the 12 h spo-11; rad-50 germ line, there is a decline in foci in late diplotene and early diakinesis nuclei, but foci are not completely eliminated by diakinesis; this suggests that some RAD-50-independent repair may occur in late prophase germ cells, but not all lesions are eliminated. Scale bars in A and B = 5 μm; scale bar in C = 7.5 μm.
(14.7 MB TIF)
We thank the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, the Caenorhabditis Gene Knockout Consortium, and A. Severson for strains, M. Zetka and A. Dernburg for antibodies, and Y. Sasagawa for helpful information regarding use of the MAPK antibody. We are grateful to E. Martinez-Perez, K. Nabeshima, and M. Colaiacovo for training in cytological methods, to E. Martinez-Perez for sharing data that informed our choices of dosage and time points for γ-irradiation experiments, to M. Jiang and J. Bessler for assistance with the irradiator, and to J. Bessler, S. Rosu, M. Zastrow, and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript.
MH, GMC, and AMV conceived and designed the experiments and analyzed the data. MH and GMC performed the experiments. MH and AMV wrote the paper.
- 1. Page SL, Hawley RS (2003) Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet. Science 301: 785–789.
- 2. Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52: 1–53.
- 3. Colaiacovo MP, MacQueen AJ, Martinez-Perez E, McDonald K, Adamo A, et al. (2003) Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. Dev Cell 5: 463–474.
- 4. Martinez-Perez E, Villeneuve AM (2005) HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. Genes Dev 19: 2727–2743.
- 5. Assenmacher N, Hopfner KP (2004) MRE11/RAD50/NBS1: complex activities. Chromosoma 113: 157–166.
- 6. Krogh BO, Symington LS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233–271.
- 7. Stracker TH, Theunissen JW, Morales M, Petrini JH (2004) The Mre11 complex and the metabolism of chromosome breaks: the importance of communicating and holding things together. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 845–854.
- 8. Paull TT, Lee JH (2005) The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex and its role as a DNA double-strand break sensor for ATM. Cell Cycle 4: 737–740.
- 9. Church DL, Guan KL, Lambie EJ (1995) Three genes of the MAP kinase cascade, mek-2, mpk-1/sur-1 and let-60 ras, are required for meiotic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 121: 2525–2535.
- 10. Zetka MC, Kawasaki I, Strome S, Muller F (1999) Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13: 2258–2270.
- 11. MacQueen AJ, Colaiacovo MP, McDonald K, Villeneuve AM (2002) Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev 16: 2428–2442.
- 12. Nabeshima K, Villeneuve AM, Colaiacovo MP (2005) Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC. J Cell Biol 168: 683–689.
- 13. Hopfner KP, Karcher A, Craig L, Woo TT, Carney JP, et al. (2001) Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105: 473–485.
- 14. Hopfner KP, Craig L, Moncalian G, Zinkel RA, Usui T, et al. (2002) The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418: 562–566.
- 15. de Jager M, Trujillo KM, Sung P, Hopfner KP, Carney JP, et al. (2004) Differential arrangements of conserved building blocks among homologs of the Rad50/Mre11 DNA repair protein complex. J Mol Biol 339: 937–949.
- 16. Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2005) The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 595–648.
- 17. Boulton SJ, Gartner A, Reboul J, Vaglio P, Dyson N, et al. (2002) Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295: 127–131.
- 18. Chin GM, Villeneuve AM (2001) C. elegans mre-11 is required for meiotic recombination and DNA repair but is dispensable for the meiotic G(2) DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 15: 522–534.
- 19. MacQueen AJ, Phillips CM, Bhalla N, Weiser P, Villeneuve AM, et al. (2005) Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 123: 1037–1050.
- 20. Phillips CM, Wong C, Bhalla N, Carlton PM, Weiser P, et al. (2005) HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123: 1051–1063.
- 21. Alpi A, Pasierbek P, Gartner A, Loidl J (2003) Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 112: 6–16.
- 22. Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, et al. (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94: 387–398.
- 23. Gartner A, Milstein S, Ahmed S, Hodgkin J, Hengartner MO (2000) A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage–induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol Cell 5: 435–443.
- 24. Gartner A, MacQueen AJ, Villeneuve AM (2004) Methods for analyzing checkpoint responses in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol Biol 280: 257–274.
- 25. Miller MA, Nguyen VQ, Lee MH, Kosinski M, Schedl T, et al. (2001) A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science 291: 2144–2147.
- 26. Jaramillo-Lambert A, Ellefson M, Villeneuve AM, Engebrecht J (2007) Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line. Dev Biol 308: 206–221.
- 27. Kelly KO, Dernburg AF, Stanfield GM, Villeneuve AM (2000) Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis. Genetics 156: 617–630.
- 28. Hollingsworth NM, Goetsch L, Byers B (1990) The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 61: 73–84.
- 29. Caryl AP, Armstrong SJ, Jones GH, Franklin FC (2000) A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1. Chromosoma 109: 62–71.
- 30. Couteau F, Nabeshima K, Villeneuve A, Zetka M (2004) A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Curr Biol 14: 585–592.
- 31. Couteau F, Zetka M (2005) HTP-1 coordinates synaptonemal complex assembly with homolog alignment during meiosis in C. elegans. Genes Dev 19: 2744–2756.
- 32. Martin JS, Winkelmann N, Petalcorin MI, McIlwraith MJ, Boulton SJ (2005) RAD-51-dependent and -independent roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-related protein during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3127–3139.
- 33. Takanami T, Sato S, Ishihara T, Katsura I, Takahashi H, et al. (1998) Characterization of a Caenorhabditis elegans recA-like gene Ce-rdh-1 involved in meiotic recombination. DNA Res 5: 373–377.
- 34. Rinaldo C, Bazzicalupo P, Ederle S, Hilliard M, La Volpe A (2002) Roles for Caenorhabditis elegans rad-51 in meiosis and in resistance to ionizing radiation during development. Genetics 160: 471–479.
- 35. Pasierbek P, Jantsch M, Melcher M, Schleiffer A, Schweizer D, et al. (2001) A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev 15: 1349–1360.
- 36. Hansen D, Wilson-Berry L, Dang T, Schedl T (2004) Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation. Development 131: 93–104.
- 37. Maciejowski J, Ugel N, Mishra B, Isopi M, Hubbard EJ (2006) Quantitative analysis of germline mitosis in adult C. elegans. Dev Biol 292: 142–151.
- 38. Crittenden SL, Leonhard KA, Byrd DT, Kimble J (2006) Cellular analyses of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabditis elegans adult germ line. Mol Biol Cell 17: 3051–3061.
- 39. Garcia-Muse T, Boulton SJ (2005) Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans. Embo J 24: 4345–4355.
- 40. Polanowska J, Martin JS, Garcia-Muse T, Petalcorin MI, Boulton SJ (2006) A conserved pathway to activate BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites. Embo J 25: 2178–2188.
- 41. Cao L, Alani E, Kleckner N (1990) A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell 61: 1089–1101.
- 42. Nairz K, Klein F (1997) mre11S–a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11: 2272–2290.
- 43. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375–384.
- 44. Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S (2005) Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436: 1053–1057.
- 45. Young JA, Hyppa RW, Smith GR (2004) Conserved and nonconserved proteins for meiotic DNA breakage and repair in yeasts. Genetics 167: 593–605.
- 46. Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K (2004) Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell 16: 1968–1978.
- 47. Mehrotra S, McKim KS (2006) Temporal analysis of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and repair in Drosophila females. PLoS Genet 2: e200.
- 48. Arora C, Kee K, Maleki S, Keeney S (2004) Antiviral protein Ski8 is a direct partner of Spo11 in meiotic DNA break formation, independent of its cytoplasmic role in RNA metabolism. Mol Cell 13: 549–559.
- 49. Li J, Hooker GW, Roeder GS (2006) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer2, Mei4 and Rec114 form a complex required for meiotic double-strand break formation. Genetics 173: 1969–1981.
- 50. Maleki S, Neale MJ, Arora C, Henderson KA, Keeney S (2007) Interactions between Mei4, Rec114, and other proteins required for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma 116: 471–486.
- 51. Blat Y, Protacio RU, Hunter N, Kleckner N (2002) Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell 111: 791–802.
- 52. Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu HG, Mistrot C, Unal E, et al. (2004) Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2: E259.
- 53. Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, et al. (2001) Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 27: 271–276.
- 54. Nasmyth K (2005) How do so few control so many? Cell 120: 739–746.
- 55. Smolikov S, Eizinger A, Hurlburt A, Rogers E, Villeneuve AM, et al. (2007) Synapsis-defective mutants reveal a correlation between chromosome conformation and the mode of double-strand break repair during C. elegans meiosis. Genetics 176: 2027–2033.
- 56. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94.
- 57. Chan RC, Severson AF, Meyer BJ (2004) Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions. J Cell Biol 167: 613–625.
- 58. Sasagawa Y, Yamanaka K, Nishikori S, Ogura T (2007) Caenorhabditis elegans p97/CDC-48 is crucial for progression of meiosis I. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 920–924.
- 59. Villeneuve AM (1994) A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136: 887–902.
- 60. Bessler JB, Reddy KC, Hayashi M, Hodgkin J, Villeneuve AM (2007) A role for Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 in the proliferation vs. meiotic entry decision. Genetics 175: 2029–2037.